Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

20
2
12
20
2
12

Evidence suggests MDMA mayincreaseSide effects.

22 studies (34 claims)

Emerging evidence

Typical effective dose 100 (100100) mgacross 6 dosed studies

Study Claims

34 of 36
InterventionDirectionEndpointTypePopulationDosageTitle
co-administration of methylphenidate and MDMAIncreases - were significantly higherhaemodynamic and adverse effects
Human
healthy subjects125 mg MDMAPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of methylphenidate and MDMA administered alone or in combination.cited 99×
combined use of methylphenidate and MDMAIncreases - potentially enhancescardiovascular and adverse effects
Human
125 mg MDMAPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of methylphenidate and MDMA administered alone or in combination.cited 99×
combined use of methylphenidate and MDMANo effect - does not produce morepsychoactive effects
Human
125 mg MDMAPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of methylphenidate and MDMA administered alone or in combination.cited 99×
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP)Increases - associated with increased odds of side effectsodds of side effects
Human
Not specified in the abstract.Side-effects of mdma-assisted psychotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.cited 6×
co-administration of MDMA (100 mg)No effect - did not improve acute effectsacute effects
Human
24 healthy subjects (12 women, 12 men)100 mg MDMA and 100 µg LSDAcute effects of MDMA and LSD co-administration in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participants.cited 23×
co-administration of MDMA (100 mg) and LSD (100 µg)Increases - acute subjective effects lasted longerduration of acute subjective effects
Human
24 healthy subjects (12 women, 12 men)100 mg MDMA and 100 µg LSDAcute effects of MDMA and LSD co-administration in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participants.cited 23×
co-administration of MDMA (100 mg) and LSD (100 µg)No effect - did not change the quality of acute subjective effectsquality of acute subjective effects
Human
24 healthy subjects (12 women, 12 men)100 mg MDMA and 100 µg LSDAcute effects of MDMA and LSD co-administration in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participants.cited 23×
MDMAIncreases - are more pronouncedacute MDMA effects
Human
womenNot specifiedKey interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics.cited 9×
MDMAIncreases - are more pronouncedacute MDMA effects
Human
women compared to menNot specifiedKey interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics.cited 9×
MDMANo effect - can slightly modifyplasma concentrations and effects
Human
Not specifiedKey interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics.cited 9×
MDMAIncreases - inducespro-social effects
Human
Not specifiedKey interindividual determinants in MDMA pharmacodynamics.cited 9×
MDMAIncreases - exhibit heightened sensitivity to the subjective effects ofanxiety, adverse effects, and negative side effects
Human
femalesNot specifiedWomen and MDMA: particularities of gender and sex.cited 2×
MDMA (concentration increased)Increases - effects reversed, with a peak at 2.5 μManxiolytic and prosocial effects
Animal
3-week-old zebrafish0.5 μM to 2.5 μM (acute exposure)Exploring the impact of MDMA and oxytocin ligands on anxiety and social responses: A comprehensive behavioural and molecular study in the zebrafish model.
MDMA (single oral weight-adjusted dose)Increases - determined greatercardiovascular effects
Human
subjects with COMT val158met (val/val) or 5-HTTLPR (l/*) genotypes of high functionalitySingle oral dose of 1.4 mg/kg (range 75-100 mg).Clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): the influence of gender and genetics (CYP2D6, COMT, 5-HTT).cited 38×
MDMA (single oral weight-adjusted dose)Increases - displayed more intensenegative effects (dizziness, sedation, depression, and psychotic symptoms)
Human
female subjectsSingle oral dose of 1.4 mg/kg (range 75-100 mg).Clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): the influence of gender and genetics (CYP2D6, COMT, 5-HTT).cited 38×
MDMA (single oral weight-adjusted dose)Increases - determined greaternegative subjective effects (dizziness, anxiety, sedation)
Human
subjects with COMT val158met (met/*) or 5-HTTLPR (s/s) genotypes of low functionalitySingle oral dose of 1.4 mg/kg (range 75-100 mg).Clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): the influence of gender and genetics (CYP2D6, COMT, 5-HTT).cited 38×
MDMA (single oral weight-adjusted dose)Increases - displayed more intensephysiological effects (heart rate, and oral temperature)
Human
female subjectsSingle oral dose of 1.4 mg/kg (range 75-100 mg).Clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): the influence of gender and genetics (CYP2D6, COMT, 5-HTT).cited 38×
MDMA (single oral weight-adjusted dose)No effect - experienced similarpositive effects
Human
healthy, recreational users of ecstasy (all extensive metabolizers for CYP2D6)Single oral dose of 1.4 mg/kg (range 75-100 mg).Clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): the influence of gender and genetics (CYP2D6, COMT, 5-HTT).cited 38×
MDMANo effect - did not persist beyond 24 hdesirable (prohedonic) effects
Animal
ratsDose-dependent (specific amounts not provided)A Multimodal Preclinical Assessment of MDMA in Female and Male Rats: Prohedonic, Cognition Disruptive, and Prosocial Effects.cited 3×
MDMANo effect - did not persist beyond 24 hundesirable (cognition disruptive) effects
Animal
ratsDose-dependent (specific amounts not provided)A Multimodal Preclinical Assessment of MDMA in Female and Male Rats: Prohedonic, Cognition Disruptive, and Prosocial Effects.cited 3×
MDMA (125 mg)Increases - produced greater ratings ofgood drug effects
Human
28 healthy subjects0.1 mg (single dose)Distinct acute effects of LSD, MDMA, and D-amphetamine in healthy subjects.cited 146×
MDMANo effect - mediated viamood-altering effects
Human
Not specifiedThe entactogen 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; ecstasy) as a treatment aid in psychotherapy and its safety concerns.
MDMANo effect - no adverse neurocognitive effectsneurocognitive effects
Human
patients with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder, refractory to both psychotherapy and psychopharmacologyNot specified in the abstract.The safety and efficacy of {+/-}3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study.cited 373×
MDMAIncreases - mediatedneuroinflammatory effects
HumanAnimal
Not specifiedAmphetamine-related drugs neurotoxicity in humans and in experimental animals: Main mechanisms.cited 153×
MDMAIncreases - mediatedneurotoxic effects
HumanAnimal
Not specifiedAmphetamine-related drugs neurotoxicity in humans and in experimental animals: Main mechanisms.cited 153×
MDMAIncreases - have been demonstratedneurotoxic effects
Human
experimental animalsNot specifiedNeurotoxicity of MDMA: Main effects and mechanisms.cited 36×
MDMANo effect - produce mixed reinforcing and aversive effectsreinforcing and aversive effects
Human
adolescentsNot specifiedUse and abuse of dissociative and psychedelic drugs in adolescence.cited 29×
MDMA (100 mg)No effect - were observedsubjective effects
Human
patients with arginine vasopressin deficiency (central diabetes insipidus)Single oral dose of 100 mg MDMA.Oxytocin in response to MDMA provocation test in patients with arginine vasopressin deficiency (central diabetes insipidus): a single-centre, case-control study with nested, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.cited 33×
MDMA (100 mg)Increases - was associated withsubjective prosocial, empathic, and anxiolytic effects
Human
healthy controlsSingle oral dose of 100 mg MDMA.Oxytocin in response to MDMA provocation test in patients with arginine vasopressin deficiency (central diabetes insipidus): a single-centre, case-control study with nested, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.cited 33×
MDMA (ecstasy)No effect - it is impossible to estimate the individual susceptibilitysusceptibility to adverse effects
Human
individualsNot specifiedPost-mortem (re)distribution of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy"): human and animal data.cited 8×
MDMANo effect - did not changethe impairing effects of sleep loss
Human
recreational MDMA usersSingle evening doses of 0, 25, 50, and 100 mg MDMAMDMA (ecstasy) effects on actual driving performance before and after sleep deprivation, as function of dose and concentration in blood and oral fluid.cited 17×
MDMA effectsDecreases - resolved by 6 hduration of effects
Human
participants1.5 mg/kg oral racemic MDMA (comparison dose).Effects of the Psychedelic Amphetamine MDA (3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine) in Healthy Volunteers.cited 11×
combining MDMA and loud noise exposureIncreases - potentiates the effectseffects produced by each single stimulant alone
Human
experimental animal modelsNot specifiedMDMA (ecstasy) enhances loud noise-induced morphofunctional alterations in heart and adrenal gland.cited 4×
R(-)-MDMANo effect - maintaining the therapeutic effects of (±)-MDMAtherapeutic effects
Human
Not specified(±)-MDMA and its enantiomers: potential therapeutic advantages of R(-)-MDMA.cited 26×