Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

(±)-MDMA and its enantiomers: potential therapeutic advantages of R(-)-MDMA.

Psychopharmacology
February 1, 2018
Elizabeth G Pitts et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the potential clinical utility of MDMA enantiomers (S(+)-MDMA and R(-)-MDMA) compared to racemic MDMA, focusing on pharmacodynamics, neurotoxicity, and therapeutic effects.

Results Summary

Preclinical evidence suggests R(-)-MDMA may offer a better therapeutic index than racemic MDMA, maintaining therapeutic benefits while reducing side effects. However, human studies on individual enantiomers are lacking.

Population

Preclinical research (not specified if animal or human models).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
(±)-MDMA
increase
clinical utility
psychiatric and behavioral disorders
-
lent support to hypothesized clinical utility
#1
(±)-MDMA
decrease
clinical utility
-
-
potentially mitigated by a range of demonstrated adverse effects
#2
R(-)-MDMA
increase
therapeutic index
-
-
may provide an improved therapeutic index
#3
R(-)-MDMA
no change
therapeutic effects
-
-
maintaining the therapeutic effects of (±)-MDMA
#4
R(-)-MDMA
decrease
side effect profile
-
-
with a reduced side effect profile
#5
Abstract

The use of (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ((±)-MDMA) as an adjunct to psychotherapy in the treatment of psychiatric and behavioral disorders dates back over 50 years. Only in recent years have controlled and peer-reviewed preclinical and clinical studies lent support to (±)-MDMA's hypothesized clinical utility. However, the clinical utility of (±)-MDMA is potentially mitigated by a range of demonstrated adverse effects. One potential solution could lie in the individual S(+) and R(-) enantiomers that comprise (±)-MDMA. Individual enantiomers of racemic compounds have been employed in psychiatry to improve a drug's therapeutic index. Although no research has explored the individual effects of either S(+)-MDMA or R(-)-MDMA in humans in a controlled manner, preclinical research has examined similarities and differences between the two molecules and the racemic compound. This review addresses information related to the pharmacodynamics, neurotoxicity, physiological effects, and behavioral effects of S(+)-MDMA and R(-)-MDMA that might guide preclinical and clinical research. The current preclinical evidence suggests that R(-)-MDMA may provide an improved therapeutic index, maintaining the therapeutic effects of (±)-MDMA with a reduced side effect profile, and that future investigations should investigate the therapeutic potential of R(-)-MDMA.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnimalsHallucinogensHumansMental DisordersN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineStereoisomerismStress, Psychological
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety60
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations26
Citations/Year3.7
Relative Citation Ratio1.60
NIH Percentile67.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.08
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements