1
2
↑0
↓1
—2
Evidence suggests Alcohol haslittle to no effecton Metabolic cost.
1 studies (3 claims)
Emerging evidence
Study Claims
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Type | Population | Dosage | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) 1-time application (CHG-T1) | No effect - is statistically comparable for cost and effectiveness to | catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and cost | Human | patients (age≥18 years) in intensive care unit (ICU) | 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (PVI) applied 1-time or 4-times. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.cited 7× |
| 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) 1-time application (CHG-T1) | No effect - has a mean cost per alive, discharged or dead patient of | cost per patient | Human | patients (age≥18 years) in intensive care unit (ICU) | 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (PVI) applied 1-time or 4-times. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.cited 7× |
| 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) 1-time application (CHG-T1) | Decreases - saves | cost per patient | Human | patients (age≥18 years) in intensive care unit (ICU) | 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (PVI) applied 1-time or 4-times. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.cited 7× |
| 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) 4-time application (CHG-T4) | No effect - is statistically comparable for cost and effectiveness to | catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and cost | Human | patients (age≥18 years) in intensive care unit (ICU) | 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (PVI) applied 1-time or 4-times. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.cited 7× |
| 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) 4-time application (CHG-T4) | No effect - has a mean cost per alive, discharged or dead patient of | cost per patient | Human | patients (age≥18 years) in intensive care unit (ICU) | 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (PVI) applied 1-time or 4-times. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.cited 7× |