Buccal Acupuncture Reduces the Dose of Sufentanil Needed in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether buccal acupuncture could reduce perioperative analgesia requirements (specifically sufentanil dosage) and modulate serum inflammatory factors in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Results Summary
Buccal acupuncture reduced sufentanil usage without affecting hemodynamic stability, inflammatory markers, or adverse reactions. However, it did not significantly influence other analgesics, sedation scores, or pain scales, suggesting limited broader efficacy.
Population
80 female patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery, randomized into control and buccal acupuncture groups (40 each).
Effective Dosage
Not explicitly stated (acupuncture protocol details not provided in abstract).
Duration
Acute (perioperative intervention, timing inferred as single session during surgery).
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
buccal acupuncture | decrease | sufentanil | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | can reduce the dosage of | #1 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | hemodynamic indices | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | does not aggravate fluctuations in | #2 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | inflammatory responses | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | does not aggravate | #3 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | incidence of adverse reactions | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | does not aggravate | #4 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | remifentanil | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the dosages of | #5 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | propofol | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the dosages of | #6 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | urapidil | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the usage rates of | #7 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | phenylephrine | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the usage rates of | #8 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | atropine | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the usage rates of | #9 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | metoprolol | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in the usage rates of | #10 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | SBP | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #11 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | DBP | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #12 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | HR | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #13 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | MAP | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #14 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | IL-6 levels | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #15 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | SAA levels | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #16 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | CRP levels | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #17 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | PCT levels | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | no statistically significant differences in | #18 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | Ramsay sedation score (RSS) | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | were similar | #19 |
buccal acupuncture | no change | visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores | patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery | - | were similar | #20 |
BACKGROUND This study assessed the effects of buccal acupuncture on perioperative analgesia and serum inflammatory factors in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were selected and randomly allocated to the control and buccal acupuncture groups, with 40 patients in each group. Hemodynamic indices and dosages of propofol, remifentanil, sufentanil, and vasoactive drugs used during the surgery were recorded. We collected the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the patients at T4. Magnetic-sensitive immunoassay kits were used to measure plasma IL-6, SAA, CRP, and PCT concentrations in the venous blood at T0, T3, and T5. RESULTS The average dosage of sufentanil in the control group was significantly higher than that in the buccal acupuncture group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the dosages of remifentanil and propofol or in the usage rates of urapidil, phenylephrine, atropine, and metoprolol between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in SBP, DBP, HR, and MAP at T0-T5 (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in IL-6, SAA, CRP, or PCT levels at T0, T3, or T5 (all P>0.05). At T4, the RSS and VAS pain scores were similar (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Buccal acupuncture therapy for laparoscopic gynecological surgery can reduce the dosage of sufentanil and does not aggravate fluctuations in hemodynamic indices, inflammatory responses, or the incidence of adverse reactions. This has practical clinical significance in reducing the burden on patients.