Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Clinician views on acupuncture for acute pain care in a busy urban emergency department.

Complementary therapies in clinical practice
May 1, 2025
Lisa A Seaman et al. (11 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to explore clinician-related factors influencing the integration of acupuncture (PEARL program) as a nonpharmacologic treatment for pain reduction in a high-volume urban emergency department, with a focus on reducing opioid use.

Results Summary

Quantitative survey data from 99 ED clinicians indicated positive perceptions of acupuncture's appropriateness and effectiveness, while qualitative interviews with 16 clinicians highlighted its acceptability as an analgesic strategy, patient benefits, and integration challenges. Limitations include the lack of direct patient outcome data and reliance on clinician perceptions rather than clinical metrics.

Population

Emergency department clinicians in a high-volume urban setting.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

3 years (PEARL program duration)

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
acupuncture
increase
clinician attitudes
ED clinicians
-
positive perceptions of the program's appropriateness and effectiveness
#1
acupuncture
increase
acupuncture referral procedures
ED clinicians
-
improved understanding
#2
acupuncture
decrease
use of opioids
ED patients
-
acceptable analgesic strategy to reduce the use of opioids
#3
acupuncture
increase
feasibility as a nonpharmacologic addition to the comprehensive pain care plan
ED clinicians
-
strong acceptance
#4
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Opioid misuse and dependence remain critical public health issues in the U.S., contributing significantly to reduced life expectancy. Emergency departments (EDs) are key settings for implementing opioid reduction strategies when treating acute pain, such as nonpharmacologic treatment options like acupuncture. This study explored clinician-related factors influencing the integration of the Pain Elimination through Acupuncture Research and Learning (PEARL) program for pain reduction within a high-volume urban ED. METHODS: This study employed a sequential mixed methods design, involving surveys and interviews with ED clinicians. An 11-item electronic survey was administered annually to assess clinician attitudes related to appropriateness and effectiveness of integrating acupuncture into the ED's comprehensive care plan for treatment of pain. Near the end of the 3rd year of the PEARL program, semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather in-depth insights into clinician knowledge and perceptions of the program. RESULTS: Quantitative survey data from 99 eligible ED clinicians indicated positive perceptions of the program's appropriateness and effectiveness, and improved understanding of acupuncture referral procedures. Analysis of qualitative interviews conducted with 16 ED clinicians revealed five key themes: acupuncture as an acceptable analgesic strategy to reduce the use of opioids, patient benefits, program presence in the ED, integration challenges, and the need for continued education. CONCLUSION: Strong acceptance of acupuncture as a feasible nonpharmacologic addition to the comprehensive pain care plan used in the ED was observed. Dedicated space, expanded acupuncture staff and hours, and ongoing training of ED staff will require institutional support to sustain acupuncture as a nonpharmacologic treatment option for ED patients.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansAcupuncture TherapyEmergency Service, HospitalAcute PainFemaleAttitude of Health PersonnelMalePain ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultMiddle Aged
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality70/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.40
Normalized Score0.62
Related Supplements