Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

25-Hydroxyvitamin D status does not affect energy metabolism among young, healthy, non-obese adults: a metabolic chamber study.

Frontiers in endocrinology
January 1, 2024
Lin Zhang et al. (6 authors)
Clinical StudyJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to explore the association between vitamin D status and energy metabolism, including walking energy expenditure, in young, healthy, non-obese adults.

Results Summary

The study found no statistically significant differences in walking energy expenditure or other metabolic measures based on vitamin D status, with weak correlations between vitamin D and certain lipid markers.

Population

Sixty-nine healthy, non-obese adults (mean age = 22.8 years, mean BMI = 20.7 kg/m²).

Effective Dosage

Not mentioned

Duration

Not mentioned

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (10)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
vitamin D status
no change
energy metabolism
young, healthy, non-obese adults
-
does not affect
#1
vitamin D status
no change
total energy expenditure
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#2
vitamin D status
no change
resting energy expenditure
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#3
vitamin D status
no change
sleeping energy expenditure
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#4
vitamin D status
no change
walking energy expenditure
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#5
vitamin D status
no change
carbohydrate oxidation rate
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#6
vitamin D status
no change
fat oxidation rate
healthy adults
-
no statistically significant differences in
#7
25(OH)D status
neutral
total cholesterol
healthy adults
Pearson's correlation coefficients below 0.3
statistically significant correlations were found between
#8
25(OH)D status
neutral
high-density lipoprotein
healthy adults
Pearson's correlation coefficients below 0.3
statistically significant correlations were found between
#9
25(OH)D status
neutral
free fatty acid
healthy adults
Pearson's correlation coefficients below 0.3
statistically significant correlations were found between
#10
Abstract

PURPOSE: here is a general consensus that an inverse relationship exists between vitamin D status and body mass index (BMI) in overweight and obese individuals, leading to the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the development of unfavorable metabolic phenotypes. However, evidence from non-obese adults remains limited. This study measured energy metabolism in non-obese adults using a metabolic chamber and explored its association with vitamin D status. METHODS: Sixty-nine healthy adults (mean age = 22.8 years, mean BMI = 20.7 kg/m RESULTS: A two-way ANOVA (seasonality × 25(OH)D) revealed no statistically significant differences in total energy expenditure, resting energy expenditure, sleeping energy expenditure, walking energy expenditure, carbohydrate oxidation rate, or fat oxidation rate among the three groups (p > 0.05). These results remained consistent even after adjusting for fat-free mass. Although statistically significant correlations were found between 25(OH)D status and certain lipid profile markers (i.e., total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and free fatty acid) (p < 0.05), these correlations were weak, with Pearson's correlation coefficients below 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Total 25(OH)D status does not affect energy metabolism in young, healthy, non-obese adults. Along with existing evidence, this suggests that low 25(OH)D status is more likely a consequence of unfavorable metabolic phenotypes rather than a contributing factor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR-IIR-17010604.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy MetabolismVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy20/10
Quality75/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.34
Normalized Score0.43
Related Supplements