Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
January 1, 1970
Chu Qin et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional acupuncture for pain relief using rigorously designed double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results Summary

The study found a significant positive effect on pain improvement, with no significant differences in adverse reactions between acupuncture and control groups, and no serious adverse effects reported.

Population

Not specified (general pain management population).

Effective Dosage

Not specified.

Duration

Not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (2)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
traditional acupuncture
decrease
pain improvement
-
mean difference 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.27]
significant positive effect
#1
traditional acupuncture
no change
adverse reactions
-
relative risk 1.40 [95% CI 0.52-3.74]
no significant differences
#2
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional acupuncture for pain relief based on rigorously designed RCTs with double-blind. The findings seek to provide valuable insights for clinical practice and inform future research. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials on traditional acupuncture for pain management using a double-blind design, published from database inception to November 22, 2023. The Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess potential biases in the included studies, followed by a comprehensive analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety. RESULTS: The findings show a significant positive effect on pain improvement, evidenced by changes in visual analog scale scores (mean difference 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.27]). Safety analysis showed no significant differences in adverse reactions between the acupuncture and control groups (relative risk 1.40 [95% CI 0.52-3.74]), with no serious adverse effects reported. CONCLUSION: Traditional acupuncture is effective and safe in pain management. This suggests that acupuncture can be a valuable approach in clinical practice. Future studies should explore optimal treatment durations and frequency, using larger sample sizes for more comprehensive insights.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansAcupuncture TherapyPain ManagementPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy85/10
Quality88/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.42
Normalized Score0.88
Related Supplements