Creatine supplementation does not add to resistance training effects in prostate cancer patients under androgen deprivation therapy: A double-blind randomized trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine if creatine supplementation combined with resistance exercise provided additional benefits over resistance exercise alone in preserving lean mass, muscle strength, and physical function in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.
Results Summary
The study found that while both groups (resistance exercise alone and resistance exercise with creatine) showed similar improvements in lean mass, muscle strength, and physical function, there were no significant additional benefits from creatine supplementation. No adverse events were reported from creatine use.
Population
Men aged 59-84 with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.
Effective Dosage
Not specified in the abstract.
Duration
12 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) | decrease | lean mass (LM) | patients with prostate cancer | - | leads to loss of | #1 |
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) | decrease | strength and physical function | patients with prostate cancer | - | leads to reduced | #2 |
Resistance exercise alone | no change | these ADT-induced toxicities | patients with prostate cancer undergoing ADT | - | can counteract | #3 |
resistance exercise + placebo (PLA) | increase | whole-body LM | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +0.6 kg | improvements in | #4 |
resistance exercise + creatine (SUPP) | increase | whole-body LM | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +1.3 kg | improvements in | #5 |
resistance exercise + placebo (PLA) | increase | appendicular LM | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +0.5 kg | improvements in | #6 |
resistance exercise + creatine (SUPP) | increase | appendicular LM | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +0.6 kg | improvements in | #7 |
resistance exercise + placebo (PLA) | increase | muscle strength | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +8.8-49.3 kg | improvements in | #8 |
resistance exercise + creatine (SUPP) | increase | muscle strength | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | +9.4-40.4 kg | improvements in | #9 |
resistance exercise + placebo (PLA) | increase | physical function | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | - | improvements in | #10 |
resistance exercise + creatine (SUPP) | increase | physical function | Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT | - | improvements in | #11 |
creatine supplementation | no change | LM, muscle strength and physical function | patients with prostate cancer undergoing ADT | - | no additional effects of | #12 |
A short-term program of resistance exercise alone | increase | LM, muscle strength and physical function | patients with prostate cancer undergoing ADT | - | results in meaningful improvements in | #13 |
OBJECTIVES: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) leads to loss of lean mass (LM) and reduced strength and physical function. Resistance exercise alone can counteract these changes; however, it is unknown if the addition of creatine supplementation can further protect against these ADT-induced toxicities. We compared the effects of creatine supplementation with resistance exercise versus resistance exercise alone in patients with prostate cancer undergoing ADT on LM, muscle strength, and physical function. DESIGN: A 12-week randomized trial. METHODS: Men with prostate cancer receiving ADT (n = 30) were randomized to either resistance exercise + placebo (PLA) or resistance exercise + creatine (SUPP), with both groups undertaking supervised exercise 3 days per week. Outcomes included whole body and appendicular LM and fat mass (FM) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, as well as muscle strength (chest press, seated low, leg press), and physical function (timed up-and-go, chair rise, 400-m walk) assessed at baseline and following the intervention. RESULTS: Patients were aged 59-84 years with a BMI of 28.6 kg·m-2. PLA completed a mean of 30 sessions (83 %) and SUPP a mean of 33 sessions (92 %). Despite similar within-group improvements (p < 0.05) in whole-body LM (PLA +0.6 kg, SUPP +1.3 kg), appendicular LM (PLA +0.5 kg, SUPP +0.6 kg), muscle strength (PLA +8.8-49.3 kg, SUPP +9.4-40.4 kg) and physical function, there were no between group differences (p = 0.078-0.951). No adverse events were reported due to creatine supplementation or resistance exercise. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term program of resistance exercise alone results in meaningful improvements in LM, muscle strength and physical function, with no additional effects of creatine supplementation.