Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

How to improve reward sensitivity - Predictors of long-term effects of a randomized controlled online intervention trial.

Journal of affective disorders
January 1, 1970
L Potsch et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of online mindfulness interventions in improving reward sensitivity and reducing depressive symptoms, compared to other interventions.

Results Summary

The study found that improvements in reward sensitivity, anhedonia, and depressive symptoms were stable over a four-month follow-up, with no significant differences between mindfulness and other active interventions. Positive changes in depressive expectations predicted long-term improvements in reward sensitivity.

Population

127 participants in a randomized controlled trial, likely individuals with depression or reward sensitivity issues (specific demographics not detailed).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Two-week online intervention with a four-month follow-up.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
two-week online intervention (behavioral activation vs. mindfulness and gratitude vs. combination of both)
increase
reward sensitivity
127 participants
-
improvement concerning
#1
two-week online intervention (behavioral activation vs. mindfulness and gratitude vs. combination of both)
decrease
anhedonia
127 participants
-
reduction of
#2
two-week online intervention (behavioral activation vs. mindfulness and gratitude vs. combination of both)
decrease
depressive symptoms
127 participants
-
reduction of
#3
behavioral activation vs. mindfulness and gratitude vs. combination of both
no change
treatment effects
127 participants
-
did not find evidence for differences between
#4
positive changes in depressive expectations
increase
long-term improvements in reward sensitivity
127 participants
-
were a significant predictor of
#5
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reward sensitivity is a central maintaining factor of depression. Current treatments fail at sufficiently and reliably modifying reward processing. Therefore, we employed interventions targeting reward sensitivity and evaluated the long-term efficacy of different online interventions, additionally exploring predictors of changes in reward sensitivity. METHODS: This four-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) tested the long-term stability of treatment effects during a four-month follow-up in 127 participants of a two-week online intervention (behavioral activation vs. mindfulness and gratitude vs. combination of both). In addition, we investigated predictors of treatment success defined as improvement in reward sensitivity. Predictors we investigated were depressive expectations, stress and the type of reward implemented in the exercises of the intervention (physical activities and social encounters). RESULTS: The improvement concerning reward sensitivity, as well as the reduction of anhedonia and depressive symptoms was stable over a four-month follow-up. We did not find evidence for differences between the active intervention groups. Positive changes in depressive expectations were a significant predictor of long-term improvements in reward sensitivity. LIMITATIONS: Only self-report measures were used and the interpretation of the long-term efficacy of the online interventions is limited since the waitlist control condition was not extended to the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should focus on violating depressive expectations to facilitate updating the prediction and anticipation of future rewarding experiences. This could be a vital mechanism of change in reward sensitivity. However, future research still needs to unravel what kind of interventions are most effective in targeting reward insensitivity.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansRewardFemaleMaleAdultMiddle AgedDepressionMindfulnessAnhedoniaInternet-Based InterventionTreatment OutcomeFollow-Up Studies
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.33
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements