Caffeine supplementation during official basketball games: a randomized crossover study on the effects on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of adult male players.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine the effects of caffeine supplementation on game-related statistics and perceptual responses in male basketball players during official games.
Results Summary
Caffeine reduced fouls committed (moderate effect) and increased perceived exertion (small effect), but did not affect other game-related statistics or perceptions of endurance and power. No effects were observed based on game location or opponent level.
Population
Male semiprofessional basketball players (23.5±5.7 years).
Effective Dosage
3 mg/kg body mass, ingested 60 minutes before each game.
Duration
Not specified (crossover study during official games).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | decrease | fouls | male basketball players | - | Players committed fewer fouls | #1 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | no change | other game-related statistics | male basketball players | - | No effects of CAF were found | #2 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | increase | ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) | male basketball players | - | RPE was higher | #3 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | no change | perceptions of endurance | male basketball players | - | no differences | #4 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | no change | perceptions of power | male basketball players | - | no differences | #5 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | increase | defensive performance | semiprofessional basketball players | - | can improve defensive performance | #6 |
caffeine (CAF) supplementation | increase | physical performances | semiprofessional basketball players | - | possibly increasing physical performances | #7 |
BACKGROUND: This study examined the effects of caffeine (CAF) supplementation on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of male basketball players during official games. METHODS: Eight players (23.5±5.7 years) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study. Sixty minutes before the start of each game, players ingested a dose of either CAF (3 mg/kg body mass) or placebo (PLA) in a randomized order. Game-related statistics were collected. After the games, players reported ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and their perceptions of endurance and power. Separate linear mixed models evaluated the effects of treatment (CAF, PLA), game location (home, away), and opponent level (better, worse) on game-related statistics and perceptual responses. RESULTS: Players committed fewer fouls when taking CAF compared to PLA (P<0.001, ES=0.75, moderate). No effects of CAF were found for the other game-related statistics (all P>0.05). RPE was higher in CAF compared to PLA (P=0.031, ES: 0.49, small). There were no differences in perceptions of endurance (P=0.388) or power (P=0.988). No effects of game location or opponent level were found for game-related statistics or perceptual responses (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that caffeine supplementation can improve defensive performance in semiprofessional basketball players while also possibly increasing physical performances, seen the higher RPE.