Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Plant-based diet and survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
January 1, 2025
En Cheng et al. (13 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether a plant-based diet is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

Results Summary

The study found that higher adherence to a plant-based diet, particularly one rich in healthful plant foods, was associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival in metastatic CRC patients. No significant association was observed for unhealthful plant-based diets.

Population

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (n=1284).

Effective Dosage

Not specified (dietary indices based on food frequency questionnaires).

Duration

Median follow-up of 6.1 years.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
plant-based diet index (PDI)
decrease
overall survival (OS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76 [0.62-0.94]
had significantly better survival
#1
plant-based diet index (PDI)
decrease
progression-free survival (PFS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81 [0.66-0.99]
had significantly better survival
#2
healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI)
decrease
overall survival (OS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81 [0.65-1.01]
Similar findings were observed
#3
healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI)
decrease
progression-free survival (PFS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80 [0.65-0.98]
Similar findings were observed
#4
unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI)
no change
overall survival (OS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16 [0.94-1.43]
was not associated with worse survival
#5
unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI)
no change
progression-free survival (PFS)
patients with metastatic CRC
hazard ratio [HR] = 1.12 [0.92-1.36]
was not associated with worse survival
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: A plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. METHODS: Using an National Cancer Institute-sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated 3 indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of 3 indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We observed 1100 deaths and 1204 progression events (median follow-up = 6.1 years). Compared with the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (hazard ratio [HR] for OS = 0.76 [0.62-0.94], Ptrend = .004; PFS = 0.81 [0.66-0.99], Ptrend = .09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS = 0.81 [0.65-1.01], Ptrend = .053; PFS = 0.80 [0.65-0.98], Ptrend = .04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS = 1.16 [0.94-1.43], Ptrend = .21; PFS = 1.12 [0.92-1.36], Ptrend = .42). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansColorectal NeoplasmsMaleFemaleMiddle AgedAgedDiet, VegetarianNeoplasm MetastasisVegetablesFruitDiet, Plant-Based
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality88/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations1
Citations/Year1.0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.48
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements