Balance Interventions to Improve Upright Balance Control and Balance Confidence in People With Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury or Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy, components, and dosage of interventions, including walking, for improving upright balance control, balance confidence, and reducing falls in adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D).
Results Summary
Walking interventions and upright balance training with visual feedback showed clinically meaningful and significant effects on improving standing balance control. Only walking interventions significantly improved balance confidence, but no significant dosage response was found.
Population
Adults aged 18-74 with chronic, motor-incomplete SCI/D (males: females = 2.4:1).
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking interventions | increase | standing balance control | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had clinically meaningful and significant pooled effects on improving | #1 |
Upright balance training with visual feedback | increase | standing balance control | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had clinically meaningful and significant pooled effects on improving | #2 |
Walking interventions | increase | balance confidence | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had a significant pooled effect on improving | #3 |
Walking interventions | increase | upright balance control | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had greater effects on | #4 |
Upright balance training with visual feedback | increase | upright balance control | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had greater effects on | #5 |
Conventional physiotherapy | no change | upright balance control | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had lesser effects on | #6 |
Balance interventions | no change | dosage response | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | had no significant findings on | #7 |
Balance interventions | neutral | occurrence of falls | adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) | - | were evaluated by few studies on the effects on | #8 |
OBJECTIVES: To assist with clinical decision making, evidence syntheses are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of available interventions and examine the intervention components and dosage parameters. This systematic review and meta-analysis described the efficacy, components and dosage of interventions targeting upright balance control, balance confidence, and/or falls in adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). DATA SOURCES: A search strategy following the population, intervention, control, outcome framework was developed. Six databases were searched: APA PsychInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Emcare Nursing, Web of Science CC, and Medline. STUDY SELECTION: Title, abstract, and full-text screening were conducted by 2 researchers independently. Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) adults with chronic, motor-incomplete SCI/D; (2) physical intervention targeting upright postural control; and (3) clinical and/or biomechanical measures of upright balance control and/or balance confidence and/or documentation of falls. DATA EXTRACTION: Participant characteristics, balance intervention details, adverse events, and study results were extracted. The Downs and Black Checklist was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses on pre-post intervention outcomes and a meta-regression of dosage were completed. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search returned 1664 unique studies; 26 were included. Methodological quality was moderate to good. Participants were 500 individuals with SCI/D, aged 18-74 years (males: females = 2.4:1). Minor adverse events were reported in 8 studies (eg, muscle soreness and fatigue). Walking interventions and upright balance training with visual feedback had clinically meaningful and significant pooled effects on improving standing balance control. Only walking interventions had a significant pooled effect on improving balance confidence. There were no significant findings on dosage response. Few studies evaluated the effects of balance interventions on the occurrence of falls. CONCLUSIONS: Walking interventions and upright balance training with visual feedback had greater effects on upright balance control than conventional physiotherapy; however, the quality of the evidence was very low.