Lateral quadratus lumborum block vs acupuncture for postcesarean analgesia: a randomized clinical trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of acupuncture versus lateral quadratus lumborum block (L-QLB) for postoperative pain control after cesarean section.
Results Summary
Acupuncture did not reduce postoperative pain scores or analgesic consumption compared to L-QLB but improved recovery quality (QoR-15 scores) and accelerated gastrointestinal function and mobilization times.
Population
190 patients with singleton-term pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Effective Dosage
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy (specific dosage not detailed).
Duration
Outcomes assessed up to 48 hours postoperatively.
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
acupuncture | no change | pain scores at 24 hours on movement | patients scheduled for cesarean section | 3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4] | were similar | #1 |
acupuncture | no change | PCIA consumption | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | showed no difference | #2 |
acupuncture | no change | pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | showed no difference | #3 |
acupuncture | increase | QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | improved | #4 |
acupuncture | decrease | time to first flatus | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | shortened | #5 |
acupuncture | decrease | time to first drinking | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | shortened | #6 |
acupuncture | no change | postoperative pain scores | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | did not lower | #7 |
acupuncture | no change | analgesic medication consumption | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | did not reduce | #8 |
L-QLB | no change | pain scores at 24 hours on movement | patients scheduled for cesarean section | 3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4] | were similar | #9 |
L-QLB | no change | PCIA consumption | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | showed no difference | #10 |
L-QLB | no change | pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively | patients scheduled for cesarean section | - | showed no difference | #11 |
L-QLB | increase | time to mobilization | patients scheduled for cesarean section | 17.0 [15.0-19.0] hours vs 15.3 [13.3-17.0] hours | was markedly prolonged | #12 |
BACKGROUND: Improved pain control after cesarean section remains a challenging objective. Although both the lateral quadratus lumborum block (L-QLB) and acupuncture have been reported to provide superior postoperative analgesia after cesarean section when compared to placebo, the efficacy of these techniques has never been compared head-to-head. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the comparative analgesic efficacy of L-QLB and acupuncture following elective cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 190 patients with singleton-term pregnancies scheduled for cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to acupuncture group or L-QLB group. L-QLB group received bilateral L-QLB with 0.33% ropivacaine and sham acupuncture, acupuncture group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy, and sham L-QLB. All patients received the standard postoperative pain treatment. The primary outcome was pain scores on movement at 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included pain scores in the first 48 hours postoperatively, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) demands, analgesia-related adverse effects, postoperative complications, QoR-15, the time to mobilization, and gastrointestinal function. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [range]) pain scores at 24 hours on movement were similar in patients receiving acupuncture or L-QLB (3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4], respectively; P=.40). PCIA consumption and pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively also showed no difference between the two groups. The acupuncture improved QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (P<.001), as well as shortened the time to first flatus (P=.03) and first drinking (P<.001) compared to L-QLB. In addition, the median time to mobilization in the L-QLB group was markedly prolonged compare with acupuncture group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] hours vs 15.3 [13.3-17.0] hours, estimated median difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1-2; P<.001). CONCLUSION: As a component of multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean section, acupuncture did not lower postoperative pain scores or reduce analgesic medication consumption compared to L-QLB.