Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Lateral quadratus lumborum block vs acupuncture for postcesarean analgesia: a randomized clinical trial.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
August 1, 2024
Pei-Pei Qin et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of acupuncture versus lateral quadratus lumborum block (L-QLB) for postoperative pain control after cesarean section.

Results Summary

Acupuncture did not reduce postoperative pain scores or analgesic consumption compared to L-QLB but improved recovery quality (QoR-15 scores) and accelerated gastrointestinal function and mobilization times.

Population

190 patients with singleton-term pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Effective Dosage

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy (specific dosage not detailed).

Duration

Outcomes assessed up to 48 hours postoperatively.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
acupuncture
no change
pain scores at 24 hours on movement
patients scheduled for cesarean section
3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4]
were similar
#1
acupuncture
no change
PCIA consumption
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
showed no difference
#2
acupuncture
no change
pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
showed no difference
#3
acupuncture
increase
QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
improved
#4
acupuncture
decrease
time to first flatus
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
shortened
#5
acupuncture
decrease
time to first drinking
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
shortened
#6
acupuncture
no change
postoperative pain scores
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
did not lower
#7
acupuncture
no change
analgesic medication consumption
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
did not reduce
#8
L-QLB
no change
pain scores at 24 hours on movement
patients scheduled for cesarean section
3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4]
were similar
#9
L-QLB
no change
PCIA consumption
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
showed no difference
#10
L-QLB
no change
pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively
patients scheduled for cesarean section
-
showed no difference
#11
L-QLB
increase
time to mobilization
patients scheduled for cesarean section
17.0 [15.0-19.0] hours vs 15.3 [13.3-17.0] hours
was markedly prolonged
#12
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved pain control after cesarean section remains a challenging objective. Although both the lateral quadratus lumborum block (L-QLB) and acupuncture have been reported to provide superior postoperative analgesia after cesarean section when compared to placebo, the efficacy of these techniques has never been compared head-to-head. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the comparative analgesic efficacy of L-QLB and acupuncture following elective cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 190 patients with singleton-term pregnancies scheduled for cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to acupuncture group or L-QLB group. L-QLB group received bilateral L-QLB with 0.33% ropivacaine and sham acupuncture, acupuncture group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy, and sham L-QLB. All patients received the standard postoperative pain treatment. The primary outcome was pain scores on movement at 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included pain scores in the first 48 hours postoperatively, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) demands, analgesia-related adverse effects, postoperative complications, QoR-15, the time to mobilization, and gastrointestinal function. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [range]) pain scores at 24 hours on movement were similar in patients receiving acupuncture or L-QLB (3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4], respectively; P=.40). PCIA consumption and pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively also showed no difference between the two groups. The acupuncture improved QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (P<.001), as well as shortened the time to first flatus (P=.03) and first drinking (P<.001) compared to L-QLB. In addition, the median time to mobilization in the L-QLB group was markedly prolonged compare with acupuncture group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] hours vs 15.3 [13.3-17.0] hours, estimated median difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1-2; P<.001). CONCLUSION: As a component of multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean section, acupuncture did not lower postoperative pain scores or reduce analgesic medication consumption compared to L-QLB.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansFemaleCesarean SectionPain, PostoperativePregnancyAdultNerve BlockProspective StudiesAcupuncture AnalgesiaPain MeasurementAnesthetics, LocalAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAbdominal MusclesRopivacaineTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality85/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.53
Normalized Score0.65
Related Supplements