Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A spotlight on using HIF-PH inhibitors in renal anemia.

Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy
July 1, 2024
Motoki Odawara et al. (3 authors)
ReviewJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of HIF-PHIs versus Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Results Summary

HIF-PHIs were found to be non-inferior to ESAs in maintaining or improving hemoglobin levels, but concerns about adverse events (cardiovascular outcomes, thrombosis, tumor progression) and lack of long-term safety data limit their widespread approval. ESAs remain a standard treatment, but HIF-PHIs may be considered for specific patients under caution.

Population

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Effective Dosage

Not mentioned

Duration

Not mentioned

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) together with iron supplementation
neutral
anemia
chronic kidney disease (CKD)
-
had been the standard treatment
#1
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
no change
blood hemoglobin levels
-
-
are non-inferior to ESAs
#2
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
cardiovascular outcomes
-
-
concerns about adverse events
#3
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
thrombotic events
-
-
concerns about adverse events
#4
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
tumor progression
-
-
concerns about adverse events
#5
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
-
patients with a history of thrombosis or active malignancy
-
should be used with caution
#6
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
-
Patients without them
-
may be preferable
#7
hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs)
neutral
heart failure
-
-
must take caution for signs of adverse events
#8
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) together with iron supplementation had been the standard treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) for the past decades. Recently, hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have attracted attention as a novel treatment option. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the effectiveness and the safety of HIF-PHIs based on previous clinical trials and discusses points to consider for their clinical use. EXPERT OPINION: The results from clinical trials demonstrate that HIF-PHIs are non-inferior to ESAs in terms of the efficacy to maintain or improve blood hemoglobin levels. However, concerns about adverse events including cardiovascular outcomes, thrombotic events, and tumor progression have prevented HIF-PHIs from being widely approved for clinical use. Also, long-term safety has not been demonstrated yet. Practically, HIF-PHIs should be used with caution in patients with a history of thrombosis or active malignancy. Patients without them may be preferable for HIF-PHIs if those are bothered with regular injections of ESAs or are hyporesponsive to ESAs without obvious reasons, provided that the drugs were approved in the country. Even so, clinicians must take caution for signs of adverse events such as heart failure after prescribing the drugs.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansAnemiaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHematinicsHypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline DioxygenasesAnimalsHemoglobinsProlyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety70
Efficacy80/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations5
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.89
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.49
Normalized Score0.77
A spotlight on using HIF-PH inhibitors in renal anemia. | Panacea Index