Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and Safety of Laughter Yoga in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Cureus
April 1, 2024
Selvaraj Giridharan et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleScoping ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the impact of laughter yoga on the quality of life of cancer patients, focusing on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results Summary

Laughter yoga significantly improved the quality of life of cancer patients by enhancing emotional and physical functioning and reducing symptoms of depression and stress. The findings suggest it is a promising complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practice for psychological and physical health in cancer patients.

Population

Cancer patients

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
laughter yoga
increase
quality of life
cancer patients
-
can significantly improve
#1
laughter yoga
increase
emotional and physical functioning
cancer patients
-
improving
#2
laughter yoga
decrease
symptoms of depression and stress
cancer patients
-
reducing
#3
Abstract

The use of laughter yoga as a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) strategy has recently gained interest as a potential supportive intervention for cancer patients. In this review, we aimed to assess the impact of laughter yoga on the quality of life of cancer patients, with a focus on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our analysis indicates that laughter yoga can significantly improve the quality of life of cancer patients by improving emotional and physical functioning and reducing symptoms of depression and stress. These findings suggest that laughter yoga is a promising CAM practice for enhancing cancer patients' psychological and physical health. Future research should aim to extend these studies to more extensive and more diverse populations to validate and expand upon these findings.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.34
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements