Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Haem iron versus ferrous iron salts to treat iron deficiency anaemia in Gambian children: protocol for randomised controlled trial {1}.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Mamadou Bah et al. (6 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the efficacy of haem iron versus ferrous sulphate in improving haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations in anaemic Gambian children aged 6-12 months.

Results Summary

The study design suggests a rigorous comparison of haem iron and ferrous sulphate, but the abstract does not report specific results regarding efficacy or safety outcomes.

Population

Gambian children aged 6-12 months with anaemia.

Effective Dosage

10.0 mg of elemental iron daily, either as haem or ferrous sulphate.

Duration

12 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
haem iron
increase
haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations
anaemic children aged 6-12 months
-
more efficacious than
#1
haem iron
increase
absorption
-
-
more bioavailable
#2
haem iron
no change
inflammation
-
-
absorption may not be decreased by
#3
conventional ferrous salts
decrease
inflammation
children with inflammation
-
low efficacy due to low oral absorption in children with
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends universal iron supplementation for children aged 6-23 months in countries where anaemia is seen in over 40% of the population. Conventional ferrous salts have low efficacy due to low oral absorption in children with inflammation. Haem iron is more bioavailable, and its absorption may not be decreased by inflammation. This study aims to compare daily supplementation with haem iron versus ferrous sulphate on haemoglobin concentration and serum ferritin concentration after 12 weeks of supplementation. METHODS: This will be a two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Gambian children aged 6-12 months with anaemia will be recruited within a predefined geographical area and recruited by trained field workers. Eligible participants will be individually randomised using a 1:1 ratio within permuted blocks to daily supplementation for 12 weeks with either 10.0 mg of elemental iron as haem or ferrous sulphate. Safety outcomes such as diarrhoea and infection-related adverse events will be assessed daily by the clinical team (see Bah et al. Additional file 4_Adverse event eCRF). Linear regression will be used to analyse continuous outcomes, with log transformation to normalise residuals as needed. Binary outcomes will be analysed by binomial regression or logistic regression, Primary analysis will be by modified intention-to-treat (i.e., those randomised and who ingested at least one supplement dose of iron), with multiple imputations to replace missing data. Effect estimates will be adjusted for baseline covariates (C-reactive protein, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, haemoglobin, ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor). DISCUSSION: This study will determine if therapeutic supplementation with haem iron is more efficacious than with conventional ferrous sulphate in enhancing haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations in anaemic children aged 6-12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR202210523178727.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
ChildHumansIronAnemia, Iron-DeficiencySaltsGambiaFerrous CompoundsFerritinsAnemiaHemoglobinsDietary SupplementsInflammationHemeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year2.0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.54
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Haem iron versus ferrous iron salts to treat iron deficiency... | Panacea Index