Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Does ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation depend on CYP1A2 genotypes? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Journal of sport and health science
July 1, 2024
Jieping Wang et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the influence of the CYP1A2 gene variant (rs762551) on athletes' exercise performance after caffeine intake.

Results Summary

Caffeine improved cycling time trials in individuals with the A allele of CYP1A2 but not the C allele. It had no significant effect on Wingate or countermovement jump performance, regardless of genotype.

Population

Athletes (n = 666 participants)

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Acute intake (single dose)

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
caffeine intake
decrease
cycling time trial
participants
WMD = -0.48, 95%CI: -0.83 to -0.13, p = 0.007
significantly improved
#1
acute caffeine intake
decrease
cycling time trial
individuals with the A allele
WMD = -0.90, 95%CI: -1.48 to -0.33, p = 0.002
improved
#2
acute caffeine intake
no change
cycling time trial
individuals with the C allele
WMD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.32 to 0.17, p = 0.53
did not improve
#3
caffeine supplementation
no change
Wingate test performance
-
WMD = 8.07, 95%CI: -22.04 to 38.18, p = 0.60
did not influence
#4
caffeine supplementation
no change
countermovement jump test (CMJ) performance
-
WMD = 1.17, 95%CI: -0.02 to 2.36, p = 0.05
did not influence
#5
caffeine supplementation
decrease
cycling time trials
Participants with the CYP1A2 genotype with A allele
-
improved
#6
acute caffeine supplementation
no change
Wingate performance
-
-
failed to increase
#7
acute caffeine supplementation
no change
CMJ performance
-
-
failed to increase
#8
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ergogenic effects of caffeine intake on exercise performance are well-established, even if differences exist among individuals in response to caffeine intake. The genetic variation of a specific gene, human cytochrome P450 enzyme 1A2 (CYP1A2) (rs762551), may be one reason for this difference. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the influence of CYP1A2 gene types on athletes' exercise performance after caffeine intake. METHODS: A literature search through 4 databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) was conducted until March 2023. The effect size was expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD) by calculating fixed effects meta-analysis if heterogeneity was not significant (I RESULTS: The final number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was 12 (n = 666 participants). The overall analysis showed that the cycling time trial significantly improved after caffeine intake (WMD = -0.48, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): -0.83 to -0.13, p = 0.007). In subgroup analyses, acute caffeine intake improved cycling time trial only in individuals with the A allele (WMD = -0.90, 95%CI: -1.48 to -0.33, p = 0.002), but not the C allele (WMD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.32 to 0.17, p = 0.53). Caffeine supplementation did not influence the Wingate (WMD = 8.07, 95%CI: -22.04 to 38.18, p = 0.60) or countermovement jump test (CMJ) performance (WMD = 1.17, 95%CI: -0.02 to 2.36, p = 0.05), and these outcomes were not influenced by CYP1A2 genotype. CONCLUSION: Participants with the CYP1A2 genotype with A allele improved their cycling time trials after caffeine supplementation. However, compared to placebo, acute caffeine supplementation failed to increase the Wingate or CMJ performance, regardless of CYP1A2 genotype.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2HumansCaffeineAthletic PerformancePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesGenotypeDietary SupplementsBicycling
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year6.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.90
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score3.02
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements