Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A 2-yr Randomized Controlled Trial on Creatine Supplementation during Exercise for Postmenopausal Bone Health.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise
January 1, 1970
Philip D Chilibeck et al. (9 authors)
Randomized Controlled TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to examine the effects of 2 years of creatine monohydrate supplementation combined with resistance training and walking on bone health in postmenopausal women.

Results Summary

Creatine supplementation had no effect on bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine but improved some bone geometric properties at the proximal femur. It also reduced walking time over 80 meters and increased lean tissue mass in a subanalysis, but had no effect on muscular strength.

Population

Postmenopausal women (mean age 59 years)

Effective Dosage

0.14 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹ creatine monohydrate

Duration

2 years

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
creatine monohydrate supplementation and exercise
no change
BMD of the femoral neck
postmenopausal women
creatine: 0.725 ± 0.110 to 0.712 ± 0.100 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.721 ± 0.102 to 0.706 ± 0.097 g·cm -2
had no effect on
#1
creatine supplementation
no change
BMD of the total hip
postmenopausal women
creatine: 0.879 ± 0.118 to 0.872 ± 0.114 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.881 ± 0.111 to 0.873 ± 0.109 g·cm -2
had no effect on
#2
creatine supplementation
no change
BMD of the lumbar spine
postmenopausal women
creatine: 0.932 ± 0.133 to 0.925 ± 0.131 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.923 ± 0.145 to 0.915 ± 0.143 g·cm -2
had no effect on
#3
creatine
no change
section modulus
postmenopausal women
1.35 ± 0.29 to 1.34 ± 0.26 vs 1.34 ± 0.25 to 1.28 ± 0.23 cm 3 (placebo), P = 0.0011
significantly maintained
#4
creatine
no change
buckling ratio
postmenopausal women
10.8 ± 2.6 to 11.1 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 2.6 to 11.6 ± 2.7 (placebo), P = 0.011
significantly maintained
#5
creatine
decrease
walking time over 80 m
postmenopausal women
48.6 ± 5.6 to 47.1 ± 5.4 vs 48.3 ± 4.5 to 48.2 ± 4.9 s (placebo), P = 0.0008
reduced
#6
creatine
no change
muscular strength (i.e., one-repetition maximum) during bench press
postmenopausal women
32.1 ± 12.7 to 42.6 ± 14.1 vs 30.6 ± 10.9 to 41.4 ± 14 kg (placebo)
had no effect on
#7
creatine
no change
muscular strength (i.e., one-repetition maximum) during hack squat
postmenopausal women
57.6 ± 21.6 to 84.4 ± 28.1 vs 56.6 ± 24.0 to 82.7 ± 25.0 kg (placebo)
had no effect on
#8
creatine
increase
lean tissue mass
valid completers
40.8 ± 5.7 to 43.1 ± 5.9 vs 40.4 ± 5.3 to 42.0 ± 5.2 kg (placebo), P = 0.046
increased
#9
Abstract

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to examine the effects of 2 yr of creatine monohydrate supplementation and exercise on bone health in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-seven postmenopausal women (mean age, 59 yr) were randomized to receive creatine (0.14 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) or placebo during a resistance training (3 d·wk -1 ) and walking (6 d·wk -1 ) program for 2 yr. Our primary outcome was the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), with lumbar spine BMD and proximal femur geometric properties as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, creatine supplementation had no effect on BMD of the femoral neck (creatine: 0.725 ± 0.110 to 0.712 ± 0.100 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.721 ± 0.102 to 0.706 ± 0.097 g·cm -2 ), total hip (creatine: 0.879 ± 0.118 to 0.872 ± 0.114 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.881 ± 0.111 to 0.873 ± 0.109 g·cm -2 ), or lumbar spine (creatine: 0.932 ± 0.133 to 0.925 ± 0.131 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.923 ± 0.145 to 0.915 ± 0.143 g·cm -2 ). Creatine significantly maintained section modulus (1.35 ± 0.29 to 1.34 ± 0.26 vs 1.34 ± 0.25 to 1.28 ± 0.23 cm 3 (placebo), P = 0.0011), predictive of bone bending strength, and buckling ratio (10.8 ± 2.6 to 11.1 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 2.6 to 11.6 ± 2.7 (placebo), P = 0.011), predictive of reduced cortical bending under compressive loads, at the narrow part of the femoral neck. Creatine reduced walking time over 80 m (48.6 ± 5.6 to 47.1 ± 5.4 vs 48.3 ± 4.5 to 48.2 ± 4.9 s (placebo), P = 0.0008) but had no effect on muscular strength (i.e., one-repetition maximum) during bench press (32.1 ± 12.7 to 42.6 ± 14.1 vs 30.6 ± 10.9 to 41.4 ± 14 kg (placebo)) and hack squat (57.6 ± 21.6 to 84.4 ± 28.1 vs 56.6 ± 24.0 to 82.7 ± 25.0 kg (placebo)). In the subanalysis of valid completers, creatine increased lean tissue mass compared with placebo (40.8 ± 5.7 to 43.1 ± 5.9 vs 40.4 ± 5.3 to 42.0 ± 5.2 kg (placebo), P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Two years of creatine supplementation and exercise in postmenopausal women had no effect on BMD; yet, it improved some bone geometric properties at the proximal femur.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
FemaleHumansMiddle AgedBone DensityCreatinePostmenopauseOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalFemur NeckDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind Method
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio4.31
NIH Percentile91.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.72
Normalized Score0.63
Related Supplements
A 2-yr Randomized Controlled Trial on Creatine Supplementati... | Panacea Index