Food Hardness Modulates Behavior, Cognition, and Brain Activation: A Systematic Review of Animal and Human Studies.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effect of food hardness (hard vs. soft diets) on behavior, cognition, and brain activation in animals and humans.
Results Summary
A hard food diet improved behavioral task performance in 48% of animal studies, with some human studies showing positive associations between chewing hard food, cognition, and brain function. However, 44% of animal studies found no differential effects, and methodological variations hindered meta-analysis.
Population
Animals and humans (18 animal studies, 6 human studies).
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hard food diet | increase | behavioral task performance | animals | - | improved | #1 |
soft food diets | neutral | behavioral task performance | animals | 8% | showed | #2 |
food hardness | no change | behavioral tests | animals | - | showed no differential effects | #3 |
chewing hard food | increase | cognition performance | humans | - | positive association | #4 |
chewing hard food | increase | brain function | humans | - | positive association | #5 |
dietary food hardness | increase | behavior | animals and humans | - | beneficial effects | #6 |
dietary food hardness | increase | cognition | animals and humans | - | beneficial effects | #7 |
dietary food hardness | increase | brain function | animals and humans | - | beneficial effects | #8 |
Food hardness is one of the dietary features that may impact brain functions. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the effect of food hardness (hard food versus soft food diet) on behavior, cognition, and brain activation in animals and humans (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021254204). The search was conducted on 29 June 2022 using Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Web of Science databases. Data were extracted, tabulated by food hardness as an intervention, and summarized by qualitative synthesis. The SYRCLE and JBI tools were used to assess the risk of bias (RoB) of individual studies. Of the 5427 studies identified, 18 animal studies and 6 human studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. The RoB assessment indicated that 61% of animal studies had unclear risks, 11% had moderate risks, and 28% had low risks. All human studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias. The majority (48%) of the animal studies showed that a hard food diet improved behavioral task performance compared to soft food diets (8%). However, 44% of studies also showed no differential effects of food hardness on behavioral tests. It was also evident that certain regions of the brain were activated in response to changes in food hardness in humans, with a positive association between chewing hard food, cognition performance, and brain function. However, variations in the methodologies of the included studies hindered the meta-analysis execution. In conclusion, our findings highlight the beneficial effects of dietary food hardness on behavior, cognition, and brain function in both animals and humans, however, this effect may depend on several factors that require further understanding of the causality.