Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Characterizing modifications to a comparative effectiveness research study: the OPTIMIZE trial-using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions (FRAME).

Trials
January 1, 1970
Julie M Fritz et al. (7 authors)
Clinical TrialJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to examine the effectiveness of mindfulness as part of a complex intervention for adults with chronic low back pain and to characterize modifications made to the trial due to COVID and other challenges.

Results Summary

The study outlined modifications to improve trial feasibility and treatment initiation rates, including telehealth delivery and enhanced participant engagement strategies, but did not report specific efficacy outcomes for mindfulness.

Population

Adults with chronic low back pain

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, and mindfulness
neutral
chronic low back pain
adults with chronic low back pain
-
examine the effectiveness
#1
modifications to the OPTIMIZE trial
increase
lower-than-anticipated rates of treatment initiation
potential participants
-
improve
#2
modifications to the OPTIMIZE trial
increase
trial feasibility
-
-
improve
#3
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OPTIMIZE trial is a multi-site, comparative effectiveness research (CER) study that uses a Sequential Multiple Assessment Randomized Trial (SMART) designed to examine the effectiveness of complex health interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, and mindfulness) for adults with chronic low back pain. Modifications are anticipated when implementing complex interventions in CER. Disruptions due to COVID have created unanticipated challenges also requiring modifications. Recent methodologic standards for CER studies emphasize that fully characterizing modifications made is necessary to interpret and implement trial results. The purpose of this paper is to outline the modifications made to the OPTIMIZE trial using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Interventions (FRAME) to characterize modifications to the OPTIMIZE trial in response to the COVID pandemic and other challenges encountered. METHODS: The FRAME outlines a strategy to identify and report modifications to evidence-based interventions or implementation strategies, whether planned or unplanned. We use the FRAME to characterize the process used to modify the aspects of the OPTIMIZE trial. Modifications were made to improve lower-than-anticipated rates of treatment initiation and COVID-related restrictions. Contextual modifications were made to permit telehealth delivery of treatments originally designed for in-person delivery. Training modifications were made with study personnel to provide more detailed information to potential participants, use motivational interviewing communication techniques to clarify potential participants' motivation and possible barriers to initiating treatment, and provide greater assistance with scheduling of assigned treatments. RESULTS: Modifications were developed with input from the trial's patient and stakeholder advisory panels. The goals of the modifications were to improve trial feasibility without compromising the interventions' core functions. Modifications were approved by the study funder and the trial steering committee. CONCLUSIONS: Full and transparent reporting of modifications to clinical trials, whether planned or unplanned, is critical for interpreting the trial's eventual results and considering future implementation efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03859713. Registered on March 1, 2019.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultHumansComparative Effectiveness ResearchCOVID-19Evidence-Based MedicineLow Back PainPandemics
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.39
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements