Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

MAFLD and Celiac Disease in Children.

International journal of molecular sciences
January 1, 1970
Serena Scapaticci et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to explore the factors implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis in pediatric patients with celiac disease, particularly focusing on the role of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in metabolic alterations.

Results Summary

The study suggests that a gluten-free diet may contribute to an altered metabolic profile due to its high content of sugars, proteins, saturated fats, and complex carbohydrates, potentially predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and liver fat accumulation. It also highlights the need to consider celiac disease screening in asymptomatic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) when metabolic risk factors are unclear.

Population

Pediatric patients with celiac disease, including those with obesity-related disorders like metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
gluten-free diet (GFD)
increase
metabolic profile
individuals
-
plays a pivotal role in determining an altered metabolic profile
#1
gluten-free diet (GFD)
increase
insulin resistance
individuals
-
predisposing individuals to the development of
#2
alterations in one of the components of the so-called "gut-liver axis"
increase
liver fat accumulation
-
-
might contribute to the increased afflux of toxic substances to the liver triggering
#3
alterations in one of the components of the so-called "gut-liver axis"
increase
hepatocellular damage
-
-
might contribute to the increased afflux of toxic substances to the liver triggering the liver fat accumulation and to the subsequent
#4
Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated systemic disorder elicited by the ingestion of gluten whose clinical presentation ranges from the asymptomatic form to clinical patterns characterized by multiple systemic involvement. Although CD is a disease more frequently diagnosed in patients with symptoms of malabsorption such as diarrhea, steatorrhea, weight loss, or failure to thrive, the raised rate of overweight and obesity among general pediatric and adult populations has increased the possibility to diagnose celiac disease in obese patients as well. Consequently, it is not difficult to also find obesity-related disorders in patients with CD, including "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD). The exact mechanisms linking these two conditions are not yet known. The going assumption is that a gluten-free diet (GFD) plays a pivotal role in determining an altered metabolic profile because of the elevated content of sugars, proteins, saturated fats, and complex carbohydrates, and the higher glycemic index of gluten-free products than gluten-contained foods, predisposing individuals to the development of insulin resistance. However, recent evidence supports the hypothesis that alterations in one of the components of the so-called "gut-liver axis" might contribute to the increased afflux of toxic substances to the liver triggering the liver fat accumulation and to the subsequent hepatocellular damage. The aim of this paper was to describe the actual knowledge about the factors implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis in pediatric patients with CD. The presented review allows us to conclude that the serological evaluations for CD with anti-transglutaminase antibodies, should be a part of the general workup in the asymptomatic patients with "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD) when metabolic risk factors are not evident, and in the patients with steatohepatitis when other causes of liver disease are excluded.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultHumansChildNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseCeliac DiseaseRisk FactorsGlutensObesity
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year3.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.09
NIH Percentile75.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.53
Normalized Score0.61
Related Supplements