Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Walking and Sitting Outdoors: Which Is Better for Cognitive Performance and Mental States?

International journal of environmental research and public health
January 1, 1970
Andrew W Bailey et al. (2 authors)
Randomized Controlled TrialJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the impact of short outdoor interventions (walking or sitting) on cognitive performance and neural mechanisms, with a focus on mindfulness and connection to nature.

Results Summary

Both walking and sitting groups showed improved cognitive performance, with no significant difference between them. Higher relaxation and mindfulness during the intervention predicted better post-test performance, while the walking group exhibited higher relaxation.

Population

50 randomized participants (walking and sitting groups).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Short intervention (exact duration not specified, but measurements were taken before, after, and 10 minutes post-intervention).

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
walking in an outdoor environment
increase
cognitive performance
participants
-
demonstrated improvements
#1
sitting in an outdoor environment
increase
cognitive performance
participants
-
demonstrated improvements
#2
walking in an outdoor environment
no change
cognitive performance
participants
-
no significant difference
#3
sitting in an outdoor environment
no change
cognitive performance
participants
-
no significant difference
#4
elevated levels of relaxation during the intervention
increase
post-test performance
-
-
best predictor
#5
higher connection to nature during the outdoor intervention
decrease
frontal theta (i.e., rumination)
participants
-
reported lower levels
#6
state-based mindfulness during the outdoor intervention
decrease
frontal theta (i.e., rumination)
participants
-
reported lower levels
#7
walking in an outdoor environment
increase
relaxation
walking group
-
demonstrated higher
#8
Abstract

Myriad research indicates that physical activity and natural environments enhance cognitive performance and mental health. Much of this research is cross-sectional or involves physical activity in outdoor environments, rendering it difficult to ascribe the results to a particular condition. This study utilized electroencephalography (EEG) and established cognitive performance tasks to determine the impact of a short intervention including either walking or sitting in an outdoor environment. In this experiment, a total of 50 participants were randomized into walking and sitting groups, with cognitive performance measured before, after, and 10 min post intervention. Both groups demonstrated improvements in cognitive performance, with no significant difference between groups. Elevated levels of relaxation during the intervention were the best predictor of post-test performance. Participants reporting a higher connection to nature, as well as state-based mindfulness during the outdoor intervention, also reported lower levels of frontal theta (i.e., rumination) during the interaction, while the walking group demonstrated higher relaxation. These findings provide a direct connection to neural mechanisms influenced by physical activity and the natural environment, and their impact on cognitive performance. This supports Attention Restoration Theory and the effectiveness of short outdoor interventions incorporating physical activity as a method of restoring mental attention.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansSitting PositionCross-Sectional StudiesWalkingExerciseCognition
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year2.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.16
NIH Percentile55.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.66
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Walking and Sitting Outdoors: Which Is Better for Cognitive ... | Panacea Index