Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for late-life depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal of affective disorders
January 1, 1970
Mengmeng Ji et al. (6 authors)
Meta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewJournal ArticleReviewResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of Mindfulness and other psychotherapies for treating late-life depression.

Results Summary

Mindfulness was statistically effective in reducing depression symptoms compared to non-active and active control groups, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) ranging from -0.85 to -0.74. It was ranked among the better options for effectiveness and acceptability, though life review therapy was considered the best.

Population

Older adults with late-life depression.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (20)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
behavioral activation therapy
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#1
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#2
cognitive therapy
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#3
life review therapy
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#4
mindfulness
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#5
combined psychotherapy
no change
-
participants with late-life depression
no statistically significant differences
no statistically significant differences
#6
behavioral activation therapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#7
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#8
cognitive therapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#9
life review therapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#10
mindfulness
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#11
combined psychotherapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73
statistically effective in reducing
#12
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74
more effective than the active control group
#13
life review therapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74
more effective than the active control group
#14
mindfulness
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74
more effective than the active control group
#15
combined psychotherapy
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74
more effective than the active control group
#16
life review therapy
neutral
-
participants with late-life depression
-
ranked as the best option according to effectiveness and acceptability
#17
behavioral activation therapy
neutral
acceptability
participants with late-life depression
-
the worst by acceptability
#18
all six psychotherapies
decrease
depression symptoms
participants with late-life depression
-
effective for late-life depression
#19
life review therapy
neutral
-
participants with late-life depression
-
seemed to be the best choice in terms of effectiveness and acceptability
#20
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for late-life depression. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, and Chinese Biomedicine literature (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their respective inception dates to March 30, 2022. Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of these psychological interventions were evaluated by conducting standard pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. A battery of analyses and assessments, such as the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were performed. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies with 4550 participants on six psychotherapies compared with two control groups were included in the final analysis. Notably, there were no statistically significant differences between behavioral activation therapy, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), cognitive therapy, life review therapy, mindfulness, and combined psychotherapy. Compared with the non-active control group, six psychological interventions were statistically effective in reducing depression symptoms (standardized mean differences (SMDs) range, -1.08 to -0.73). While, only CBT, life review therapy, mindfulness, and combined psychotherapy were more effective than the active control group (SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74). Life review therapy was ranked as the best option according to effectiveness and acceptability, while behavioral activation therapy was the worst by acceptability. The certainty of the evidence was mostly rated as low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity of high-quality evidence, all six psychotherapies were effective for late-life depression, and life review therapy seemed to be the best choice in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. The findings of our review could provide policymakers and service commissioners with evidence-based practice for making decisions among different psychotherapies.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansNetwork Meta-AnalysisDepressionPsychotherapyCognitive Behavioral TherapyBehavior TherapyMindfulness
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy80/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.69
NIH Percentile82.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.59
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapi... | Panacea Index