Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for late-life depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of Mindfulness and other psychotherapies for treating late-life depression.
Results Summary
Mindfulness was statistically effective in reducing depression symptoms compared to non-active and active control groups, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) ranging from -0.85 to -0.74. It was ranked among the better options for effectiveness and acceptability, though life review therapy was considered the best.
Population
Older adults with late-life depression.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
behavioral activation therapy | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #1 |
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #2 |
cognitive therapy | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #3 |
life review therapy | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #4 |
mindfulness | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #5 |
combined psychotherapy | no change | - | participants with late-life depression | no statistically significant differences | no statistically significant differences | #6 |
behavioral activation therapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #7 |
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #8 |
cognitive therapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #9 |
life review therapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #10 |
mindfulness | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #11 |
combined psychotherapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -1.08 to -0.73 | statistically effective in reducing | #12 |
cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74 | more effective than the active control group | #13 |
life review therapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74 | more effective than the active control group | #14 |
mindfulness | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74 | more effective than the active control group | #15 |
combined psychotherapy | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74 | more effective than the active control group | #16 |
life review therapy | neutral | - | participants with late-life depression | - | ranked as the best option according to effectiveness and acceptability | #17 |
behavioral activation therapy | neutral | acceptability | participants with late-life depression | - | the worst by acceptability | #18 |
all six psychotherapies | decrease | depression symptoms | participants with late-life depression | - | effective for late-life depression | #19 |
life review therapy | neutral | - | participants with late-life depression | - | seemed to be the best choice in terms of effectiveness and acceptability | #20 |
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of psychotherapies for late-life depression. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, and Chinese Biomedicine literature (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their respective inception dates to March 30, 2022. Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of these psychological interventions were evaluated by conducting standard pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. A battery of analyses and assessments, such as the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were performed. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies with 4550 participants on six psychotherapies compared with two control groups were included in the final analysis. Notably, there were no statistically significant differences between behavioral activation therapy, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), cognitive therapy, life review therapy, mindfulness, and combined psychotherapy. Compared with the non-active control group, six psychological interventions were statistically effective in reducing depression symptoms (standardized mean differences (SMDs) range, -1.08 to -0.73). While, only CBT, life review therapy, mindfulness, and combined psychotherapy were more effective than the active control group (SMDs range, -0.85 to -0.74). Life review therapy was ranked as the best option according to effectiveness and acceptability, while behavioral activation therapy was the worst by acceptability. The certainty of the evidence was mostly rated as low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity of high-quality evidence, all six psychotherapies were effective for late-life depression, and life review therapy seemed to be the best choice in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. The findings of our review could provide policymakers and service commissioners with evidence-based practice for making decisions among different psychotherapies.