Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and metabolic risk factors in obese/overweight individuals with impaired glucose regulation: A randomized controlled trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) versus a low-fat diet (LFD) on weight loss, glycemic control, and metabolic risk factors in individuals with impaired glucose regulation (IGR).
Results Summary
Both LCD and LFD achieved similar weight loss and improvements in fasting blood glucose, with no significant differences in triglyceride (TG) or liver function markers. However, the low-fat diet showed more favorable effects on total cholesterol (TC) levels.
Population
Obese/overweight adults (mean age 39.2 years, 72.5% women) with impaired glucose regulation (IGR).
Effective Dosage
LCD: 20%-25% energy from carbohydrates, 30%-45% energy from fat, 40%-45% energy from protein.
Duration
10 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | weight | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 5.80±0.6 kg | presented similar mean reduction in | #1 |
low-fat diet | decrease | weight | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 6.36±0.57 kg | presented similar mean reduction in | #2 |
heath education | decrease | weight | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 4.49±0.98 kg | presented similar mean reduction in | #3 |
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | fasting blood glucose | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 0.73±0.13 mmol/L | presented similar mean reduction in | #4 |
low-fat diet | decrease | fasting blood glucose | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 0.84±0.17 mmol/L | presented similar mean reduction in | #5 |
heath education | decrease | fasting blood glucose | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | 0.58±0.14 mmol/L | presented similar mean reduction in | #6 |
low-carbohydrate diet | no change | TG | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | no differences in the improvements of | #7 |
low-fat diet | no change | TG | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | no differences in the improvements of | #8 |
low-carbohydrate diet | no change | liver function markers | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | no differences in the improvements of | #9 |
low-fat diet | no change | liver function markers | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | no differences in the improvements of | #10 |
low-fat diet | decrease | TC level | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | exhibited more favorable effects on | #11 |
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | weight loss | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #12 |
low-fat diet | decrease | weight loss | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #13 |
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | fasting glucose | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #14 |
low-fat diet | decrease | fasting glucose | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #15 |
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | insulin reduction | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #16 |
low-fat diet | decrease | insulin reduction | obese/overweight adults with impaired glucose regulation | - | achieved similar | #17 |
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) versus low-fat diet (LFD) on weight loss, glycemic control and metabolic risk factors in individuals with impaired glucose regulation (IGR) after 10-week intervention. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: In this 10-week randomized controlled trial, 90 obese/overweight adults with IGR were randomly assigned to consume either low-carbohydrate diet (20%-25% energy from carbohydrates, 30%-45% energy from fat, 40%-45% en-ergy from protein), or low-fat diet (40%-55% energy from carbohydrates, 20%-30% energy from fat, 20%-30% energy from protein), or heath education (HE) group. The anthropometry and body composition were collected at baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 10. The glycemia and metabolic indicators were assessed at baseline and week 10. RESULTS: A total of 69 participants (mean±SE age: 39.2±1.0 years, 72.5% women) completed the intervention and were included in the final analysis. At week 10, all three groups presented similar mean reduction in weight (LCD: 5.80±0.6 kg; LFD: 6.36±0.57 kg; HE: 4.49±0.98 kg), and fasting blood glucose (LCD: 0.73±0.13 mmol/L; LFD: 0.84±0.17 mmol/L; HE: 0.58±0.14 mmol/L). Additionally, there were no differences in the improvements of TG and liver function markers between diets, the low-fat diet exhibited more favorable effects on TC level. CONCLUSIONS: Both diets achieved similar weight loss, fasting glucose, and insulin reduction in short-term, suggesting each diet pattern could be an effective strategy for the prediabetes management.