Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Enteral Iron Supplementation in Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pediatrics
January 1, 1970
Rukman M Manapurath et al. (10 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the effects of enteral iron supplementation on mortality, morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment in preterm or low birth weight infants fed human milk.

Results Summary

The study found little effect on infection or necrotising enterocolitis but noted an increase in linear growth and improvement in anemia. No significant effects were observed on weight, head circumference, cognitive development, or serum ferritin.

Population

Preterm or low birth weight infants fed human milk.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
enteral iron supplementation
no change
infection
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
relative risk [RR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.56 to 1.73
little effect on
#1
enteral iron supplementation
no change
necrotising enterocolitis
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.20
little effect on
#2
enteral iron supplementation
increase
linear growth (length)
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
mean difference 0.69 cm, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.37
an increase in
#3
enteral iron supplementation
no change
weight
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
-
little effect on
#4
enteral iron supplementation
no change
head circumference
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
-
little effect on
#5
enteral iron supplementation
no change
cognitive development
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
-
little effect on
#6
enteral iron supplementation
decrease
anemia
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.62
an improvement in
#7
enteral iron supplementation
no change
serum ferritin
preterm or LBW infants fed human milk
-
no effect on
#8
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Iron is needed for growth and development of infants globally, but preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants are at risk for severe iron deficiencies. To assess the effect of enteral iron supplementation on mortality, morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm or LBW infants fed human milk. Secondary objectives were to assess the effect on biomarkers and dose and timing. METHODS: Data sources include PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases to March 16, 2021. Study Selection includes controlled or quasi experimental study designs. Two reviewers independently extracted data. RESULTS: Eight trials (eleven reports; 1093 participants, 7 countries) were included. No trials reported mortality. At latest follow-up, there was little effect on infection (very low certainty evidence, 4 studies, 401 participants, relative risk [RR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.56 to 1.73, I2 = 0.00%) and necrotising enterocolitis (3 studies, 375 participants, RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.20, I2 = 0.00%). There was an increase in linear growth (length) (moderate certainty evidence, 3 studies, 384 participants, mean difference 0.69 cm, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.37, I2 = 0%) but little effect on weight, head circumference, or cognitive development. There was an improvement in anemia (moderate certainty evidence, 2 studies, 381 participants, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.62, I2 = 0.00%) but no effect on serum ferritin. Limitations include heterogeneity in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: There are important benefits for human milk-fed preterm and LBW infants from enteral iron supplementation. However, more randomized control trials are required to improve the certainty of evidence.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Dietary SupplementsEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIron
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety75
Efficacy70/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations15
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.62
NIH Percentile81.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.70
Normalized Score0.74
Related Supplements