Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for people with major depression.

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
September 1, 2022
Kate Williams et al. (6 authors)
Systematic ReviewJournal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to systematically review and synthesize qualitative experiences of participants with depression who took part in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT).

Results Summary

Participants reported benefits such as increased awareness, perspective, and agency, as well as acceptance towards their experiences, self, and others. However, there was variability and ambivalence regarding expectations and difficulties within mindfulness practices.

Population

Individuals with current or previous depression.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
increase
experiences of participants with depression
participants with current or previous depression
-
beneficial and provides meaningful change
#1
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
neutral
experiences of participants with depression
some participants
-
remains challenging
#2
mindfulness practices
increase
awareness, perspective and agency over their experiences
participants with current or previous depression
-
reporting increased awareness, perspective and agency
#3
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
increase
acceptance towards their experiences, self and others
participants with current or previous depression
-
developed acceptance
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is a relapse-prevention intervention for people experiencing major depression. Three qualitative meta-syntheses investigating experiences of taking part in MBCT and/or Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) across different diagnostic populations reported themes including control, choice, group processes, relationships and struggles. As multiple studies have been published since, we aimed to update, systematically review and synthesize the experiences of participants with depression taking part in MBCT. METHODS: Four databases were searched systematically (PsycInfo, Web of Science, Medline and CINAHL) up to and including 12 November 2021. Twenty-one qualitative studies met the review criteria. All papers were rated as fair using a quality appraisal tool. Meta-ethnography was applied. RESULTS: Across 21 studies of participants with current or previous depression who had participated in MBCT, three overarching themes were developed: 'Becoming skilled and taking action', 'Acceptance' and 'Ambivalence and Variability'. Participants became skilled through engagement in mindfulness practices, reporting increased awareness, perspective and agency over their experiences. Participants developed acceptance towards their experiences, self and others. There was variability and ambivalence regarding participants' expectations and difficulties within mindfulness practices. LIMITATIONS: Many studies were conducted in MBCT-research centres that may hold conflicts of interest. Many studies did not address the impact of the participant-researcher relationship thus potentially affecting their interpretations. Studies were skewed towards the experiences of female participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings help to enhance participant confidence in MBCT, alongside understanding the processes of change and the potential for difficulties. MBCT is beneficial and provides meaningful change for many but remains challenging for some.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansFemaleMindfulnessDepressive Disorder, MajorDepressionCognitive Behavioral TherapyAnthropology, CulturalTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations5
Citations/Year1.7
Relative Citation Ratio1.22
NIH Percentile57.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score2.32
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements
A systematic review and meta-ethnographic synthesis of Mindf... | Panacea Index