Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mindfulness-based therapies for cancer patients and families: a systematic review.

BMJ supportive & palliative care
January 1, 1970
Laura Torricelli et al. (8 authors)
Systematic ReviewJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs) in improving the quality of life for cancer patients and their relatives, focusing on methodological quality, MBT types, and study populations.

Results Summary

MBTs demonstrated efficacy in 25 out of 30 included RCTs, though findings were limited by study heterogeneity. Methodological quality was acceptable, but variability in measures and populations reduced generalizability.

Population

Primarily females diagnosed with breast cancer in English-speaking countries outside Europe; one study included relatives.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs)
increase
several patients' health outcomes
patients with cancer
-
highlight benefits
#1
Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs)
increase
quality of life
patients with cancer
-
efficacy has been demonstrated
#2
Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs)
increase
quality of life
their relatives
-
efficacy has been demonstrated
#3
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs) addressed to patients with cancer have been widely studied in the last two decades, and their efficacy has been systematically reviewed and meta-analysed. Although findings from literature highlight benefits of MBTs on several patients' health outcomes, these should be appraised taking into consideration the characteristics of the selected studies. In this systematic review, we summarised the current evidence of the efficacy of MBTs in improving the quality of life of both patients with cancer and their relatives, with a focus on the methodological quality, type of MBT evaluated and population involved in existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched English language articles published until February 2021. Couples of authors independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted findings. Thirty RCTs were included. RESULTS: Nearly half of the studies were performed in English-speaking countries outside of Europe, with females diagnosed with breast cancer. Most considered heterogeneous phases of illness; one study only was performed on relatives. In most cases, different measures were employed to evaluate the same outcome. The efficacy of MBTs has been demonstrated in 25 of the 30 included articles. The methodological quality of RCTs was acceptable. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of studies' characteristics makes findings on the efficacy of MBTs poorly informative with reference to different clinical and cancer-related psychological conditions. Studies on more homogeneous samples by cancer site and phase, as well as performed in different cultural contexts, could provide a basis for better evaluating and targeting MBTs' protocols for the specific needs of patients with cancer and their relatives.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansMindfulnessNeoplasmsFamilyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year2.0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.48
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements
Mindfulness-based therapies for cancer patients and families... | Panacea Index