Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Towards a mechanistic understanding of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) using an RCT neuroimaging approach: Effects on regulating own stress in social and non-social situations.

NeuroImage
January 1, 1970
Simón Guendelman et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine if mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) generalizes to everyday social stress situations and to explore the role of cognitive reappraisal and acceptance as emotion regulation mechanisms.

Results Summary

MBSR reduced self-reported stress through cognitive reappraisal and acceptance when regulating self but not others' distress. Brain activation increased for regulating own and others' emotions, though similar effects were seen in the reading intervention for self-regulation. No distant generalization effects on socio-emotional functioning were found.

Population

68 participants in a randomized controlled trial (specific demographics not detailed).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
decrease
self-reported stress
participants in the RCT
-
led to self-reported stress reduction
#1
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
increase
brain activation for regulating own emotions
participants in the RCT
-
led to increased brain activation over time
#2
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
increase
brain activation for regulating others' emotions
participants in the RCT
-
led to increased brain activation over time
#3
reading/listening intervention (READ)
increase
brain activation for regulating own stress via reappraisal
participants in the RCT
-
led to increased brain activation over time
#4
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
no change
socio-emotional functioning (cognitive empathy and compassion)
participants in the RCT
-
could also not be shown
#5
Abstract

Although much research has shown that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can reduce psychological stress, it is less clear if effects generalize to everyday social situations, which range among the largest stress triggers. Furthermore, mechanisms of MBIs have not been fully established. Emotion regulation (ER) has been suggested as one key mechanism, yet the role of cognitive reappraisal and acceptance strategies is still under debate. To address these questions, a neuroimaging-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed (n=68), comparing mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) with a reading/listening intervention (READ), using a novel dyadic paradigm for self and other emotion regulation under stress as primary outcome on behavior and brain levels and established empathy measures (clinicatrials.gov NCT03035669). Compared to READ, MBSR led to self-reported stress reduction through both cognitive reappraisal and acceptance only when regulating self and not when regulating others' distress. In addition, MBSR led to increased brain activation over time for regulating own (parietal cortex) and others' (precuneus, TPJ) emotions through cognitive reappraisal and acceptance, albeit this effect was also seen for the reading intervention for regulating own stress via reappraisal. Brain changes did not scale with subjective stress reduction and amount of meditation practice. More distant generalization effects of MBSR on socio-emotional functioning (cognitive empathy and compassion) could also not be shown. This study identified both cognitive reappraisal and acceptance as two ER mechanisms of MBSR, but indicates that effects do not extend to social settings.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
EmpathyHumansMeditationMindfulnessNeuroimagingStress, PsychologicalTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year2.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.15
NIH Percentile55.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.66
Normalized Score0.63
Related Supplements