Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Brazil and cashew nuts intake improve body composition and endothelial health in women at cardiometabolic risk (Brazilian Nuts Study): a randomized controlled trial.

The British journal of nutrition
February 23, 2022
Ana Paula Silva Caldas et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effects of Brazil and cashew nuts within an energy-restricted diet on body weight, body composition, cardiometabolic markers, and endothelial function in women at cardiometabolic risk.

Results Summary

The study found that Brazil and cashew nuts improved body composition (reduced total body fat, increased lean mass percentage), increased plasma selenium levels, and reduced endothelial inflammation (VCAM-1). However, lipid and glucose profiles, apolipoproteins, and blood pressure remained unchanged.

Population

Women at cardiometabolic risk.

Effective Dosage

45 g daily (15 g Brazil nuts + 30 g cashew nuts).

Duration

8 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
increase
plasma selenium concentration
cardiometabolic risk women
∆ = + 31.5 ± 7.8 μg/L
increased
#1
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
decrease
total body fat
cardiometabolic risk women
-1.3 ± 0.4 %
reduced
#2
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
increase
lean mass percentage
cardiometabolic risk women
-
improvement of
#3
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
decrease
soluble adhesion molecule VCAM-1
cardiometabolic risk women
24.03 ± 15.7 pg/mL vs. -22.2 ± 10.3 pg/mL
decreased
#4
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
no change
lipid profile markers
cardiometabolic risk women
-
remained unchanged
#5
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
no change
glucose profile markers
cardiometabolic risk women
-
remained unchanged
#6
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
no change
apolipoproteins
cardiometabolic risk women
-
remained unchanged
#7
Brazil and cashew nuts intake within an energy-restricted diet
no change
blood pressure
cardiometabolic risk women
-
remained unchanged
#8
Abstract

Several mechanisms have been proposed for the beneficial effect of nuts on health. However, Brazil and cashew nuts remain the least studied. We aim to evaluate the effect of these nuts within an energy-restricted diet on body weight, body composition, cardiometabolic markers, and endothelial function in cardiometabolic risk women. Brazilian nuts study is a randomized controlled parallel 8-week dietary intervention trial. Forty women were randomly allocated to 1) Control group: Energy-restricted diet without nuts, n= 19 or, 2) Brazil and cashew nuts group (BN-Group): Energy-restricted diet containing daily 45 g of nuts (15 g of Brazil nuts + 30g of cashew nuts), n= 21. At the beginning and final intervention, anthropometry, body composition, and blood pressure were measured. Fasting blood sampling was obtained to evaluate lipid profile, glucose homeostasis, and endothelial function markers. After 8-week, plasma selenium concentration increased in BN-group (∆ = + 31.5 ± 7.8 μg/L; p= 0.001). Brazil and cashew nuts intake reduced total body fat (-1.3 ± 0.4 %) parallel to improvement of lean mass percentage in BN-group compared to the control. Besides, the soluble adhesion molecule VCAM-1 decreased (24.03 ± 15.7 pg/mL vs. -22.2 ± 10.3 pg/mL; p= 0.019) after Brazil and cashew nuts intake compared to the control. However, lipid and glucose profile markers, apolipoproteins, and blood pressure remained unchanged after the intervention. Thus, the addition of Brazil and cashew nuts to an energy-restricted diet can be a healthy strategy to improve body composition, selenium status, and endothelial inflammation in cardiometabolic risk women.

Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations19
Citations/Year6.3
Relative Citation Ratio3.26
NIH Percentile86.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.44
Normalized Score0.83
Related Supplements