Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

How do placebo effects contribute to mindfulness-based analgesia? Probing acute pain effects and interactions using a randomized balanced placebo design.

Pain
January 1, 1970
Jonathan N Davies et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to characterize the role of mindfulness and placebo processes in mindfulness-based pain attenuation, specifically examining the effects of treatment (focused attention mindfulness vs. sham) and instruction (told mindfulness vs. told sham) on acute pain relief.

Results Summary

Participants receiving any intervention showed improved pain outcomes compared to no treatment, but there were no main effects or interactions of treatment or instruction on pain outcomes. However, belief in receiving mindfulness predicted increased pain threshold and tolerance, with expectancy mediating the effect on pain tolerance.

Population

153 healthy adults

Effective Dosage

6 × 20-minute sessions

Duration

Not specified (intervention duration implied by dosage)

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
any intervention
decrease
pain outcomes (unpleasantness, intensity, and tolerance)
participants receiving any intervention
-
demonstrated improved
#1
instruction manipulation
increase
expectation for pain relief
those told mindfulness relative to those told sham
-
increased expectation for pain relief
#2
treatment or instruction
no change
pain outcomes
-
no significant change
no main effects or interactions
#3
belief of receiving mindfulness
increase
pain threshold and tolerance
irrespective of actual intervention received
-
predicted increased
#4
expectancy
increase
pain tolerance
-
-
fully mediating the effect
#5
mindfulness and instruction
no change
acute pain
-
-
lack of specific effects
#6
expectancies and beliefs about the treatment
increase
pain relief
participants
-
did predict pain relief
#7
any intervention
decrease
acute pain
-
-
overall improvement after
#8
Abstract

Recent sham-controlled studies suggest placebo effects contribute to acute pain relief after mindfulness interventions. However, the specific effects of mindfulness processes and their interaction with placebo effects remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the role of mindfulness and placebo processes underlying mindfulness-based pain attenuation. Both treatment (focused attention mindfulness vs sham) and instruction (told mindfulness vs told sham) were manipulated in a balanced placebo design. Changes in acute heat pain were evaluated in 153 healthy adults randomized to receive 6 × 20 minutes of 1 of 4 treatment by instruction interventions or no treatment. Participants receiving any intervention demonstrated improved pain outcomes (unpleasantness, intensity, and tolerance) relative to those receiving no treatment. The instruction manipulation increased expectation for pain relief in those told mindfulness relative to those told sham, but there were no main effects or interactions of treatment or instruction on pain outcomes. However, irrespective of actual intervention received, the belief of receiving mindfulness predicted increased pain threshold and tolerance, with expectancy fully mediating the effect on pain tolerance. These findings suggest a lack of specific effects of mindfulness and instruction on acute pain. Nonetheless, participants' expectancies and beliefs about the treatment they received did predict pain relief. Together with the overall improvement after any intervention, these findings suggest that expectancy and belief may play a stronger role in attenuating acute pain in novices following brief mindfulness interventions than the actual mindfulness-specific processes or instructions delivered.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultHumansAcute PainAnalgesiaMindfulnessPain MeasurementPlacebo Effect
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations11
Citations/Year3.7
Relative Citation Ratio1.60
NIH Percentile67.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.73
Normalized Score0.63
Related Supplements