Effects of dietary fat manipulation on cognition in mice and rats: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to summarize the effects of high-fat and ketogenic diets on cognitive function in postweaning mice and rats and determine potential underlying mechanisms.
Results Summary
The abstract describes a systematic review protocol but does not report specific findings; it outlines the methodology for analyzing cognitive outcomes and potential mechanisms of high-fat diet effects.
Population
Postweaning mice and rats
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Western diet | increase | metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes | - | - | is associated | #1 |
Western diet | increase | brain changes and cognitive dysfunction | - | - | has been recently linked | #2 |
high-fat diet | neutral | behavioural measures of cognition | postweaning mice and rats | - | effects on | #3 |
ketogenic diet | neutral | behavioural measures of cognition | postweaning mice and rats | - | effects on | #4 |
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The Western diet that comprises high levels of long-chain saturated fats and sugar is associated not only with metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes but also has been recently linked to brain changes and cognitive dysfunction. However, in animal studies, reported effects are variable, and the mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. In the proposed review, we aim to summarise the diverse evidence of the effects of so-called 'high-fat' and ketogenic diets on behavioural measures of cognition in postweaning mice and rats, relative to animals on standard diets and to determine potential underlying mechanisms of high-fat diet-induced effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search strategy was designed to retrieve studies reporting use of a high-fat or ketogenic diet in postweaning mice and rats that included cognitive assessments. Three databases (Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched and 4487 unique references were retrieved. SCREENING AND ANNOTATION: Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers, with 330 studies retained for analysis. Characteristics of disease model choice, experimental design, intervention use and outcome assessment are to be extracted using the Systematic Review Facility (http://syrf.org.uk/) tool. Studies will be assessed for study quality and risk of bias and confidence of mechanistic involvement. DATA MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING: For cognitive outcomes, effect sizes will be calculated using normalised mean difference and summarised using a random effects model. The contribution of potential sources of heterogeneity to the observed effects of diet on cognition will be assessed using multivariable meta-regression, with partitioning of heterogeneity as a sensitivity analysis. A preliminary version of this protocol was published on 9 April 2019 on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies website (http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/camarades/research.html%23protocols). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required as there are no subjects in the proposed study.