Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Optimizing Training Response for Women in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA cardiology
January 1, 1970
Sherrie Khadanga et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) combined with intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT) versus standard moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT) on peak aerobic exercise capacity (peak Vo2) in women undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.

Results Summary

The HIIT group showed a significantly greater increase in peak Vo2 (+23%) and leg strength compared to the control group (+7%). The improvements in both peak Vo2 and leg strength were statistically significant and clinically meaningful.

Population

Women (mean age 65 years, range 43-98) participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Effective Dosage

HIIT (90% to 95% of peak heart rate) with higher-intensity lower extremity RT, 3 times per week.

Duration

12 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT)
increase
peak Vo2
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
+23%
increased to a greater degree
#1
standard moderate intensity continuous training (MCT)
increase
peak Vo2
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
+7%
increased
#2
high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT)
increase
leg strength
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
15.3 [0.3] kg
greater change
#3
standard moderate intensity continuous training (MCT)
increase
leg strength
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
6.4 [1.1] kg
change
#4
high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT)
increase
exercise training response
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
-
enhanced exercise training response
#5
high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
increase
peak Vo2
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
-
significantly greater improvements
#6
high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
increase
leg strength
women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR)
-
significantly greater improvements
#7
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Despite lower baseline fitness levels, women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) do not typically improve peak aerobic exercise capacity (defined as peak oxygen uptake [peak Vo2]) compared with men in CR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT) compared with standard moderate intensity continuous training (MCT) on peak Vo2 among women in CR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2017 to February 2020 included women from a community-based cardiac rehabilitation program affiliated with a university hospital in Vermont. A total of 56 women (mean [SD] age, 65 [11] years; range 43-98 years) participating in CR enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: MCT (70% to 85% of peak heart rate [HR]) with moderate intensive RT or HIIT (90% to 95% of peak HR) along with higher-intensity lower extremity RT 3 times per week over 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in peak Vo2 (L/min) from baseline to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Peak Vo2 increased to a greater degree in the HIIT group (+23%) than in the control group (+7%) (mean [SD] increase, 0.3 [0.2] L/min vs 0.1 [0.2] L/min; P = .03). Similarly, the change in leg strength was greater in the HIIT-RT group compared with the control group (mean [SD] increase, 15.3 [0.3] kg vs 6.4 [1.1] kg; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An exercise protocol combining HIIT and intensive lower extremity RT enhanced exercise training response for women in CR compared with standard CR exercise training. Women randomized to HIIT experienced significantly greater improvements in both peak Vo2 and leg strength during CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03438968.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac RehabilitationCoronary Artery BypassExercise TherapyFemaleHeart FailureHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOxygen ConsumptionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionResistance TrainingWomen
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations20
Citations/Year6.7
Relative Citation Ratio2.59
NIH Percentile81.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.74
Normalized Score0.70