Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

High-intensity interval training versus progressive high-intensity circuit resistance training on endothelial function and cardiorespiratory fitness in heart failure: A preliminary randomized controlled trial.

PloS one
January 1, 2021
Natália Turri-Silva et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to preliminarily assess the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT) on endothelial function, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and physical performance in heart failure patients.

Results Summary

HIIT improved cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak and METs) and isokinetic torque peak, while CRT improved physical performance (reduced chair stand test time). No significant effects were observed on endothelial function.

Population

Heart failure patients (aged 56 ± 10 years, mainly NYHA class I and II, hemodynamically stable).

Effective Dosage

At least 36 exercise sessions (specific frequency not detailed).

Duration

Duration not explicitly stated, but implied by the number of sessions.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT)
increase
VO2 peak
heart failure patients
+2.1±6.5 mL/kg/min
were able to produce a positive effect on
#1
progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT)
increase
VO2 peak
heart failure patients
+3.0±4.2 mL/kg/min
were able to produce a positive effect on
#2
high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT)
increase
METs
heart failure patients
+0.6±1.8
were able to produce a positive effect on
#3
progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT)
increase
METs
heart failure patients
+0.9±1.2
were able to produce a positive effect on
#4
high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT)
increase
isokinetic torque peak
heart failure patients
+8.8±55.8 Nm
increased
#5
progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT)
decrease
chair stand test completion time
heart failure patients
-3.3±3.2 s
reduced
#6
high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT)
increase
global physical performance
heart failure patients
-
improved
#7
high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT) and progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT)
no change
endothelial function
heart failure patients
-
no effects on
#8
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Exercise training is strongly recommended as a therapeutic approach to treat individuals with heart failure. High-intensity exercise training modalities still controversial in this population. The study aims to preliminary assess the consequences of high-intensity exercise training modalities, aerobic interval training (HIIT) and progressive high circuit-resistance training (CRT), on primarily endothelial function and cardiorespiratory fitness, and secondly on muscle strength and physical performance in heart failure patients. METHODS: This preliminary multicentric randomized controlled trial comprised 23 heart failure patients, aged 56 ± 10 years old, mainly New York Heart Association classification I and II (%), hemodynamically stable, who compromise at least 36 exercise sessions of a randomly assigned intervention (HIIT, CRT or control group). Endothelial function, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, muscle strength and physical performance were completed at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Although no effects on endothelial function; both HIIT and CRT modalities were able to produce a positive effect on [Formula: see text] peak (HIIT = +2.1±6.5, CRT = +3.0±4.2 and control group = -0.1± 5.3 mL/kg/min, time*group p-value<0,05) and METs (HIIT = +0.6±1.8, CRT = +0.9±1.2 and control group = 0±1.6, time*group p-value<0,05). Only HIIT increased isokinetic torque peak (HIIT = +8.8±55.8, CRT = 0.0±60.7 and control group = 1.6±57.6 Nm) matched p-value<0,05. Regarding the physical performance, the CRT modality reduced chair stand test completion time (HIIT = -0.7±3.1, CRT = -3.3±3.2 and control group = -0.3±2.5 s, matched p-value<0,05 and HIIT improved global physical performance(time*group p<0,05). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study trends to indicate for the first time that high-intensity interval training promotes a jointly superior effect compared to progressive high intensity circuit-resistance training by improving cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and physical performance. Further research with larger cohort is necessary. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ReBEC RBR-668c8v.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedBody CompositionCardiorespiratory FitnessCircuit-Based ExerciseEndothelium, VascularFemaleHeart FailureHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations20
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.28
NIH Percentile78.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.40
Normalized Score0.64