The effect of backward walking observational training on gait parameters and balance in chronic stroke: randomized controlled study.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether backward walking action observational training (BWOT) improves gait parameters and balance in chronic stroke patients.
Results Summary
The BWOT group showed significant improvements in gait velocity, step length, stride lengths, static balance (measured by 5TSTS, COP displacement, and weight distribution), and dynamic balance (measured by ABC scale) compared to the landscape observational training group. The study was limited by a small sample size and short duration (4 weeks).
Population
Twenty-four chronic stroke patients, randomly assigned to BWOT (N=12) and landscape observational training (N=12) groups.
Effective Dosage
Traditional therapy for 5 days per week and BWOT for 3 days a week.
Duration
4 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | gait velocity | chronic stroke patients | p=0.001, η2=0.470 | showed significant improvements in | #1 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | step length | chronic stroke patients | P=0.007, η2=0.313 | showed significant improvements in | #2 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | stride lengths | chronic stroke patients | P<0.002, η2=0.431 | showed significant improvements in | #3 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | 5 Times Sit-To-Stand Test (5TSTS) | chronic stroke patients | P=0.021, η2=0.231 | showed significant improvements in | #4 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | center of pressure (COP) velocity | chronic stroke patients | P=0.022, η2=0.226 | showed significant improvements in | #5 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | center of pressure (COP) length | chronic stroke patients | P=0.001, η2=0.504 | showed significant improvements in | #6 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | weight distribution (WD) of the affected side | chronic stroke patients | P=0.033, η2=0.193 | showed significant improvements in | #7 |
backward walking action observational training (BWOT) | increase | activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) score | chronic stroke patients | P=0.023, η2=0.226 | showed significant improvements in | #8 |
4-week BWOT training program | increase | gait parameters | stroke patients | - | significantly improved | #9 |
4-week BWOT training program | increase | static balance | stroke patients | - | significantly improved | #10 |
4-week BWOT training program | increase | dynamic balance | stroke patients | - | significantly improved | #11 |
BACKGROUND: Backward walking (BW) and action observation training may potentially help people at risk of falls. Moreover, action observation training could be a potential intervention to improve gait after a stroke. AIM: We aimed to identify the effects of BW action observational training (BWOT) on gait parameters and balance in chronic stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. POPULATION: Twenty-four chronic stroke patients were randomly assigned to BWOT (N.=12) and landscape observational training (LOT) (N.=12) groups. METHODS: The BWOT group performed BW after watching a video of a BW, while the LOT group performed BW training after watching a video of a landscape. Both groups received traditional therapy for 5 days per week and BWOT for 3 days a week for 4 weeks. The primary and secondary outcomes were gait and balance, respectively. Static balance was measured using the 5 Times Sit-To-Stand Test (5TSTS), the center of pressure (COP) displacement, and weight distribution (WD) of the affected side. Dynamic balance was measured using the activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. RESULTS: The BWOT group showed significant improvements in gait velocity (p=0.001, η2=0.470), step length (P=0.007, η2=0.313), stride lengths (P<0.002, η2=0.431), 5TSTS (P=0.021, η2=0.231), COP velocity (P=0.022, η2=0.226), length (P=0.001, η2=0.504), WD of the affected side (P=0.033, η2=0.193), and ABC score (P=0.023, η2=0.226) than the LOT group. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-week BWOT training program significantly improved the gait parameters and static and dynamic balance in stroke patients. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: BWOT is an accessible and effective method of rehabilitation training that can also be applied to conventional therapy as a useful method for improving the gait and balance after stroke.