Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Two decades of mindfulness-based interventions for binge eating: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of psychosomatic research
October 1, 2021
Dominique Grohmann et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in reducing binge eating severity over two decades of research.

Results Summary

MBIs significantly reduced binge eating severity at the end of trials but benefits were not maintained at follow-up. MBIs also reduced depression and improved emotion regulation and mindfulness ability.

Population

Clinical and non-clinical samples with binge eating severity.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
binge eating severity
clinical and non-clinical samples
g = -0.39, 95% CI -0.68, -0.11
significantly reduced
#1
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
no change
binge eating severity
clinical and non-clinical samples
g = -0.06, 95% CI, -0.31, 0.20
was not maintained
#2
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
depression
clinical and non-clinical samples
-
significantly reduced
#3
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
increase
emotion regulation
clinical and non-clinical samples
-
improved
#4
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
increase
mindfulness ability
clinical and non-clinical samples
-
improved
#5
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are being increasingly used as interventions for eating disorders including binge eating. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess two decades of research on the efficacy of MBIs in reducing binge eating severity. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library for trials assessing the use of MBIs to treat binge eating severity in both clinical and non-clinical samples. The systematic review and meta-analysis was pre-registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020182395). RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 21 samples (11 RCT and 10 uncontrolled samples) met inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses on the 11 RCT samples (n = 618: MBIs n = 335, controls n = 283) showed that MBIs significantly reduced binge eating severity (g = -0.39, 95% CI -0.68, -0.11) at end of trial, but was not maintained at follow-up (g = -0.06, 95% CI, -0.31, 0.20, k = 5). No evidence of publication bias was detected. On the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, trials were rarely rated at high risk of bias and drop-out rates did not differ between MBIs and control groups. MBIs also significantly reduced depression, and improved both emotion regulation and mindfulness ability. CONCLUSION: MBIs reduce binge eating severity at the end of trials. Benefits were not maintained at follow-up; however, only five studies were assessed. Future well-powered trials should focus on assessing diversity better, including more men and people from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Binge-Eating DisorderEthnicityFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansMindfulnessMinority Groups
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year3.5
Relative Citation Ratio1.99
NIH Percentile74.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score2.63
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements