The impact of a tailored mindfulness-based program for resident physicians on distress and the quality of care: A randomised controlled trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to examine the impact of a tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) on distress and quality of care among resident physicians.
Results Summary
The intervention group showed significant improvements in burnout, perceived stress, perceived job strain, and third-party-rated empathy and attentiveness, but no differences were observed in other outcomes like depression, anxiety, or hair cortisol secretion.
Population
Resident physicians
Effective Dosage
8-week tailored MBP with a coursebook, followed by a 4-month maintenance phase
Duration
8 weeks (intervention) + 4 months (maintenance)
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | decrease | burnout at t2 | resident physicians | d = 0.32, p = 0.046 | showed greater improvements | #1 |
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | decrease | perceived stress at t1 | resident physicians | d = 0.31, p = 0.046 | showed greater improvements | #2 |
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | decrease | perceived job strain at t1 | resident physicians | d = 0.33, p = 0.026 | showed greater improvements | #3 |
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | increase | supervisor rated empathy at t2 | resident physicians | d = 0.71, p = 0.037 | showed greater improvements | #4 |
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | increase | colleague rated attentiveness at t2 | resident physicians | d = 0.85, p = .006 | showed greater improvements | #5 |
tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) | no change | the other outcomes | resident physicians | - | There was no difference between groups | #6 |
BACKGROUND: Many resident physicians suffer from distress, which endangers their individual health and the quality of care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a tailored mindfulness-based program (MBP) for resident physicians on distress and the quality of care. METHODS: A single-centre, two-armed, longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The intervention group took part in an 8-week, tailored MBP that included a coursebook. The MBP was followed by a 4-month maintenance phase. The active control group received the coursebook for self-study. Assessments were at baseline (t0, 0 months), after the intervention (t1, 2 months), after the maintenance phase (t2, 6 months), and at follow-up (t3, 12 months). The primary outcome was a change in burnout at t2. Secondary outcomes included perceived stress, mental distress, perceived job strain, depression, anxiety, hair cortisol secretion, self-reported medical errors and third-party ratings by patients, supervisors and colleagues. RESULTS: Seventy-six participants were randomised to the intervention and 71 to the control group. The intervention group showed greater improvements in the primary outcome (burnout at t2, d = 0.32, p = 0.046), in perceived stress (d = 0.31, p = 0.046) and perceived job strain (d = 0.33, p = 0.026) at t1, and in supervisor rated empathy (d = 0.71, p = 0.037) and colleague rated attentiveness (d = 0.85, p = .006) at t2. There was no difference between groups in the other outcomes. CONCLUSION: A tailored MBP for resident physicians improved burnout and might have improved other aspects of distress and the quality of care.