A plant-based diet in overweight adults in a 16-week randomized clinical trial: The role of dietary acid load.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether a plant-based diet (vegan) influences body weight, body composition, and insulin sensitivity by altering dietary acid load.
Results Summary
The vegan group showed significant reductions in dietary acid load (PRAL and NEAP), body weight (6.4 kg), fat mass, visceral fat, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), while improving insulin sensitivity (PREDIM), compared to the control group. These changes were independent of energy intake and suggest a potential causal relationship.
Population
244 participants (122 in vegan group, 122 in control group).
Effective Dosage
Not specified (whole-food plant-based diet).
Duration
16 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vegan diet | decrease | Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) | participants | -24.7 mEq/day | decreased significantly | #1 |
vegan diet | decrease | Net Endogenous Acid Production (NEAP) | participants | -23.8 mEq/day | decreased significantly | #2 |
control diet | no change | Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) | participants | - | no change | #3 |
control diet | no change | Net Endogenous Acid Production (NEAP) | participants | - | no change | #4 |
vegan diet | decrease | body weight | participants | 6.4 kg | decreased | #5 |
control diet | decrease | body weight | participants | 0.5 kg | decreased | #6 |
vegan diet | decrease | fat mass | participants | - | reduction | #7 |
vegan diet | decrease | visceral fat | participants | - | reduction | #8 |
vegan diet | decrease | HOMA-IR index | participants | - | decreased | #9 |
vegan diet | increase | PREDIM | participants | - | increased | #10 |
dietary acid load (PRAL) | increase | body weight | participants | r = +0.37 | correlated positively with changes in | #11 |
dietary acid load (NEAP) | increase | body weight | participants | r = +0.37 | correlated positively with changes in | #12 |
dietary acid load (PRAL) | increase | fat mass | participants | r = +0.32 | correlated positively with changes in | #13 |
dietary acid load (NEAP) | increase | fat mass | participants | r = +0.32 | correlated positively with changes in | #14 |
dietary acid load (PRAL) | increase | visceral fat | participants | r = +0.19 | correlated positively with changes in | #15 |
dietary acid load (NEAP) | increase | visceral fat | participants | r = +0.15 | correlated positively with changes in | #16 |
dietary acid load (PRAL) | increase | HOMA | participants | r = +0.17 | correlated positively with changes in | #17 |
dietary acid load (NEAP) | increase | HOMA | participants | r = +0.20 | correlated positively with changes in | #18 |
dietary acid load (PRAL) | decrease | PREDIM | participants | r = -0.22 | correlated negatively with changes in | #19 |
dietary acid load (NEAP) | decrease | PREDIM | participants | r = -0.27 | correlated negatively with changes in | #20 |
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that changes in dietary acid load may influence body weight, body composition, and insulin sensitivity. METHODS: Participants (n = 244) were randomly assigned to an intervention (vegan) (n = 122) or control group (n = 122) for 16 weeks. Before and after the intervention period, body composition was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Insulin resistance was assessed with the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) index and predicted insulin sensitivity index (PREDIM). Repeated measure ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL) and Net Endogenous Acid Production (NEAP) decreased significantly in the vegan group with no change in the control group (treatment effect -24.7 mEq/day [95% CI -30.2 to -19.2]; p < 0.001; and -23.8 mEq/day [95% CI -29.6 to -18.0]; p < 0.001, respectively). Body weight decreased by 6.4 kg in the vegan group, compared with 0.5 kg in the control group (treatment effect -5.9 kg [95% CI -6.8 to -5.0]; Gxt, p < 0.001), largely due to a reduction in fat mass and visceral fat. HOMA-IR index decreased and PREDIM increased in the vegan group. After adjustment for energy intake, changes in PRAL and NEAP correlated positively with changes in body weight (r = +0.37; p < 0.001; and r = +0.37; p < 0.001, respectively), fat mass (r = +0.32; p < 0.001; and r = +0.32; p < 0.001, respectively), visceral fat (r = +0.19; p = 0.006; and r = +0.15; p = 0.03, respectively), and HOMA (r = +0.17; p = 0.02; and r = +0.20; p = 0.006, respectively), and negatively with changes in PREDIM (r = -0.22; p = 0.002; and r = -0.27; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dietary acid load as part of a plant-based diet was associated with changes in body weight, body composition, and insulin sensitivity, independent of energy intake. Mechanistic explanations suggest that the relationship may be causal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698955.