The Efficacy of Backward Walking on Static Stability, Proprioception, Pain, and Physical Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether backward walking (BW) improves static stability, proprioception, pain, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Results Summary
BW combined with conventional treatment significantly improved static stability (reduced COP sway), pain (lower NRS scores), and physical function (lower WOMAC scores) compared to conventional treatment alone. However, BW did not significantly enhance proprioception (ATE and CT) relative to the control group.
Population
Thirty-two individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), divided into two groups of 16 each (BW group and control group).
Effective Dosage
4-week BW training (specific frequency/duration per session not detailed).
Duration
4 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | center of pressure sway (sway area and sway length) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | - | showed a significant decline | #1 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | average trajectory error | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | - | showed a significant decline | #2 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | numerical rating scale (pain) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | - | showed a significant decline | #3 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (knee function) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | - | showed a significant decline | #4 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | center of pressure sway area | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | (610.50 ± 464.26) mm2 vs. (538.69 ± 420.52) mm2 | showed a significantly greater decrease | #5 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | numerical rating scale (pain) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | (1.56 ± 0.63) vs. (2.25 ± 0.86) | showed a significantly greater decrease | #6 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | decrease | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (knee function) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | (11.69 ± 2.50) vs. (16.19 ± 3.94) | showed a significantly greater decrease | #7 |
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments | no change | proprioception (average trajectory error and completion time) | subjects with knee osteoarthritis | - | was closely similar | #8 |
backward walking | decrease | pain | KOA patients | - | is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in reducing | #9 |
backward walking | increase | physical function | KOA patients | - | is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in improving | #10 |
backward walking | increase | static stability | KOA patients | - | is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in improving | #11 |
OBJECTIVE: Impaired static stability and proprioception have been observed in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), which serves as a major factor increasing risk of fall. This study aimed to investigate the effects of backward walking (BW) on static stability, proprioception, pain, and physical function in KOA patients. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either an BW group (BG, n = 16) or a control group (CG, n = 16). The participants in the BG received combination treatment of a 4-week BW training and conventional treatments, while those in the CG was treated with conventional treatments alone. All the participants were tested for the assessment of static stability [center of pressure (COP) sway, including sway length (SL, mm) and sway area (SA, mm2)] and proprioception [average trajectory error (ATE, %) and completion time (CT, second)]. Additionally, pain and knee function scores were measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, respectively. The assessments were conducted before and after intervention. RESULTS: The COP sway (SA and SL), ATE, NRS, and WOMAC showed a significant decline at week 4 in the two groups in contrast to their baseline (P < 0.05). Moreover, after 4-week intervention, the SA [(610.50 ± 464.26) mm2 vs. (538.69 ± 420.52) mm2], NRS [(1.56 ± 0.63) vs. (2.25 ± 0.86)], and WOMAC [(11.69 ± 2.50) vs. (16.19 ± 3.94)] showed a significantly greater decrease in the BG compared to the CG (P < 0.05, respectively). However, the proprioception (ATE and CT) was closely similar between both groups at week 4 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: BW is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in reducing pain, improving physical function and static stability for KOA patients. It should be taken into consideration when developing rehabilitation programs for people with KOA.