Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The Efficacy of Backward Walking on Static Stability, Proprioception, Pain, and Physical Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM
May 5, 2021
Zehua Chen et al. (9 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether backward walking (BW) improves static stability, proprioception, pain, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Results Summary

BW combined with conventional treatment significantly improved static stability (reduced COP sway), pain (lower NRS scores), and physical function (lower WOMAC scores) compared to conventional treatment alone. However, BW did not significantly enhance proprioception (ATE and CT) relative to the control group.

Population

Thirty-two individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), divided into two groups of 16 each (BW group and control group).

Effective Dosage

4-week BW training (specific frequency/duration per session not detailed).

Duration

4 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
center of pressure sway (sway area and sway length)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
-
showed a significant decline
#1
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
average trajectory error
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
-
showed a significant decline
#2
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
numerical rating scale (pain)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
-
showed a significant decline
#3
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (knee function)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
-
showed a significant decline
#4
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
center of pressure sway area
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
(610.50 ± 464.26) mm2 vs. (538.69 ± 420.52) mm2
showed a significantly greater decrease
#5
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
numerical rating scale (pain)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
(1.56 ± 0.63) vs. (2.25 ± 0.86)
showed a significantly greater decrease
#6
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
decrease
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (knee function)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
(11.69 ± 2.50) vs. (16.19 ± 3.94)
showed a significantly greater decrease
#7
backward walking training combined with conventional treatments
no change
proprioception (average trajectory error and completion time)
subjects with knee osteoarthritis
-
was closely similar
#8
backward walking
decrease
pain
KOA patients
-
is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in reducing
#9
backward walking
increase
physical function
KOA patients
-
is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in improving
#10
backward walking
increase
static stability
KOA patients
-
is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in improving
#11
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Impaired static stability and proprioception have been observed in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), which serves as a major factor increasing risk of fall. This study aimed to investigate the effects of backward walking (BW) on static stability, proprioception, pain, and physical function in KOA patients. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either an BW group (BG, n = 16) or a control group (CG, n = 16). The participants in the BG received combination treatment of a 4-week BW training and conventional treatments, while those in the CG was treated with conventional treatments alone. All the participants were tested for the assessment of static stability [center of pressure (COP) sway, including sway length (SL, mm) and sway area (SA, mm2)] and proprioception [average trajectory error (ATE, %) and completion time (CT, second)]. Additionally, pain and knee function scores were measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, respectively. The assessments were conducted before and after intervention. RESULTS: The COP sway (SA and SL), ATE, NRS, and WOMAC showed a significant decline at week 4 in the two groups in contrast to their baseline (P < 0.05). Moreover, after 4-week intervention, the SA [(610.50 ± 464.26) mm2 vs. (538.69 ± 420.52) mm2], NRS [(1.56 ± 0.63) vs. (2.25 ± 0.86)], and WOMAC [(11.69 ± 2.50) vs. (16.19 ± 3.94)] showed a significantly greater decrease in the BG compared to the CG (P < 0.05, respectively). However, the proprioception (ATE and CT) was closely similar between both groups at week 4 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: BW is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in reducing pain, improving physical function and static stability for KOA patients. It should be taken into consideration when developing rehabilitation programs for people with KOA.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy80/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations12
Citations/Year3.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.82
NIH Percentile71.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.31
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements