WWOM VII: Effectiveness of systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions in the management of BMS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions, including melatonin, compared to placebo in treating burning mouth syndrome (BMS) based on IMMPACT-recommended outcome domains.
Results Summary
The study found low evidence for the effectiveness of melatonin in reducing pain intensity in BMS patients, based on a limited number of RCTs. The evidence was less robust compared to herbal compounds but more substantial than some other interventions.
Population
Adults with burning mouth syndrome (n=734 participants across 14 RCTs).
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
6 ± 2 weeks (for pain intensity assessment in most studies)
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
alpha-lipoic acid | decrease | pain intensity | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | yielded very low evidence for the effectiveness | #1 |
clonazepam | decrease | pain intensity | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | yielded very low evidence for the effectiveness | #2 |
trazodone | decrease | pain intensity | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | low evidence for effectiveness | #3 |
melatonin | decrease | pain intensity | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | low evidence for effectiveness | #4 |
herbal compounds | decrease | pain intensity | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | moderate evidence for effectiveness | #5 |
select pharmacological interventions | decrease | symptoms | participants with burning mouth syndrome | - | are associated with improved symptoms | #6 |
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions compared to placebo in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the core outcome domains recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). METHODS: A systematic literature review of RCTs, concerning systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions for BMS, published from January 1994 through October 2019, and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (n = 734 participants) were included. Of those, nine were eligible for the quantitative assessment due to the availability/homogeneity of data for at least one of the IMMPACT domains. Pain intensity was the only domain reported in all RCTs. Weighted mean changes in pain intensity, based on visual analogue scale (ΔVAS), were reported in three RCTs at 6 ± 2 weeks and only one RCT at 10+ weeks follow-ups. Quantitative assessment, based on ΔVAS, yielded very low evidence for the effectiveness of alpha-lipoic acid and clonazepam, low evidence for effectiveness of trazodone and melatonin, and moderate evidence for herbal compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the RCTs studied, variable levels of evidence exist that suggest that select pharmacological interventions are associated with improved symptoms. However, the underreporting of IMMPACT domains in BMS RCTs restricts the multidimensional assessment of systemic interventions outcomes. Standardized outcome measures need to be applied to future RCTs to improve understanding of intervention outcomes.