Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Markers of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Intervention Trials.

International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism
January 1, 1970
Bethany Northeast et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether creatine supplementation accelerates recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage by assessing muscle function, soreness, inflammation, and oxidative stress.

Results Summary

Creatine supplementation did not significantly improve muscle strength, soreness, range of motion, or inflammation at any follow-up time. It only reduced creatine kinase activity at 48 hours post-exercise, with high heterogeneity across studies.

Population

Adults aged 20-60 years (235 males, 43 females).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
creatine supplementation
no change
muscle strength
adult participants (≥18 years)
null
did not alter
#1
creatine supplementation
no change
muscle soreness
adult participants (≥18 years)
null
did not alter
#2
creatine supplementation
no change
range of motion
adult participants (≥18 years)
null
did not alter
#3
creatine supplementation
no change
inflammation
adult participants (≥18 years)
null
did not alter
#4
creatine supplementation
decrease
creatine kinase activity
adult participants (≥18 years)
standardized mean difference: -1.06; 95% confidence interval [-1.97, -0.14]
attenuated
#5
creatine supplementation
no change
recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage
adult participants (≥18 years)
null
does not accelerate
#6
Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of creatine supplementation on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage, and is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles from inception until April 2020. Inclusion criteria were adult participants (≥18 years); creatine provided before and/or after exercise versus a noncreatine comparator; measurement of muscle function recovery, muscle soreness, inflammation, myocellular protein efflux, oxidative stress; range of motion; randomized controlled trials in humans. Thirteen studies (totaling 278 participants; 235 males and 43 females; age range 20-60 years) were deemed eligible for analysis. Data extraction was performed independently by both authors. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to critically appraise the studies; forest plots were generated with random-effects model and standardized mean differences. Creatine supplementation did not alter muscle strength, muscle soreness, range of motion, or inflammation at each of the five follow-up times after exercise (<30 min, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr; p > .05). Creatine attenuated creatine kinase activity at 48-hr postexercise (standardized mean difference: -1.06; 95% confidence interval [-1.97, -0.14]; p = .02) but at no other time points. High (I2; >75%) and significant (Chi2; p < .01) heterogeneity was identified for all outcome measures at various follow-up times. In conclusion, creatine supplementation does not accelerate recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage; however, well-controlled studies with higher sample sizes are warranted to verify these conclusions. Systematic review registration (PROSPERO CRD42020178735).

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultBiomarkersChi-Square DistributionConfidence IntervalsCreatineCreatine KinaseDietary SupplementsExerciseFemaleHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMuscle ProteinsMuscle StrengthMyalgiaMyositisOxidative StressPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesPublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy30/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations12
Citations/Year3.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.73
NIH Percentile70%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.61
Normalized Score0.47
Related Supplements