Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

High-Protein Plant-Based Diet Versus a Protein-Matched Omnivorous Diet to Support Resistance Training Adaptations: A Comparison Between Habitual Vegans and Omnivores.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
June 1, 2021
Victoria Hevia-Larraín et al. (10 authors)
Clinical TrialJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of an exclusively plant-based protein diet versus a mixed diet on muscle mass and strength gains in young men undergoing resistance training.

Results Summary

Both plant-based and mixed diets resulted in similar significant increases in leg lean mass, muscle cross-sectional area, and strength, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. The study concluded that protein source does not affect resistance training-induced adaptations when protein intake is adequate.

Population

Healthy young men (19 vegans and 19 omnivores, aged 26 ± 5 years).

Effective Dosage

1.6 g kg-1 day-1 of protein, adjusted via supplemental protein (soy for vegans, whey for omnivores).

Duration

12 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (19)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
exclusively plant-based protein diet
no change
supporting muscle strength and mass accrual
untrained young men consuming adequate amounts of protein
-
is not different than a protein-matched mixed diet
#1
resistance training program
increase
leg lean mass
young men who were habitual vegans
1.2 ± 1.0 kg
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#2
resistance training program
increase
rectus femoris cross-sectional area
young men who were habitual vegans
1.0 ± 0.6 cm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#3
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis cross-sectional area
young men who were habitual vegans
2.2 ± 1.1 cm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#4
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type I cross-sectional area
young men who were habitual vegans
741 ± 323 µm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#5
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type II cross-sectional area
young men who were habitual vegans
921 ± 458 µm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#6
resistance training program
increase
leg-press 1RM
young men who were habitual vegans
97 ± 38 kg
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#7
resistance training program
increase
leg lean mass
young men who were omnivores
1.2 ± 0.8 kg
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#8
resistance training program
increase
rectus femoris cross-sectional area
young men who were omnivores
0.9 ± 0.5 cm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#9
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis cross-sectional area
young men who were omnivores
2.8 ± 1.0 cm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#10
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type I cross-sectional area
young men who were omnivores
677 ± 617 µm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#11
resistance training program
increase
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type II cross-sectional area
young men who were omnivores
844 ± 638 µm2
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#12
resistance training program
increase
leg-press 1RM
young men who were omnivores
117 ± 35 kg
significant PRE-to-POST increases
#13
dietary protein source
no change
leg lean mass
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#14
dietary protein source
no change
rectus femoris cross-sectional area
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#15
dietary protein source
no change
vastus lateralis cross-sectional area
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#16
dietary protein source
no change
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type I cross-sectional area
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#17
dietary protein source
no change
vastus lateralis muscle fiber type II cross-sectional area
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#18
dietary protein source
no change
leg-press 1RM
healthy young men undertaking resistance training
-
no between-group differences
#19
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute protein turnover studies suggest lower anabolic response after ingestion of plant vs. animal proteins. However, the effects of an exclusively plant-based protein diet on resistance training-induced adaptations are under investigation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of dietary protein source [exclusively plant-based vs. mixed diet] on changes in muscle mass and strength in healthy young men undertaking resistance training. METHODS: Nineteen young men who were habitual vegans (VEG 26 ± 5 years; 72.7 ± 7.1 kg, 22.9 ± 2.3 kg/m2) and nineteen young men who were omnivores (OMN 26 ± 4 years; 73.3 ± 7.8 kg, 23.6 ± 2.3 kg/m2) undertook a 12-week, twice weekly, supervised resistance training program. Habitual protein intake was assessed at baseline and adjusted to 1.6 g kg-1 day-1 via supplemental protein (soy for VEG or whey for OMN). Dietary intake was monitored every four weeks during the intervention. Leg lean mass, whole muscle, and muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA), as well as leg-press 1RM were assessed before (PRE) and after the intervention (POST). RESULTS: Both groups showed significant (all p < 0.05) PRE-to-POST increases in leg lean mass (VEG: 1.2 ± 1.0 kg; OMN: 1.2 ± 0.8 kg), rectus femoris CSA (VEG: 1.0 ± 0.6 cm2; OMN: 0.9 ± 0.5 cm2), vastus lateralis CSA (VEG: 2.2 ± 1.1 cm2; OMN: 2.8 ± 1.0 cm2), vastus lateralis muscle fiber type I (VEG: 741 ± 323 µm2; OMN: 677 ± 617 µm2) and type II CSA (VEG: 921 ± 458 µm2; OMN: 844 ± 638 µm2), and leg-press 1RM (VEG: 97 ± 38 kg; OMN: 117 ± 35 kg), with no between-group differences for any of the variables (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: A high-protein (~ 1.6 g kg-1 day-1), exclusively plant-based diet (plant-based whole foods + soy protein isolate supplementation) is not different than a protein-matched mixed diet (mixed whole foods + whey protein supplementation) in supporting muscle strength and mass accrual, suggesting that protein source does not affect resistance training-induced adaptations in untrained young men consuming adequate amounts of protein. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03907059. April 8, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnimalsDietDiet, VegetarianDietary SupplementsHumansMaleMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalResistance TrainingVegans
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations65
Citations/Year16.3
Relative Citation Ratio7.71
NIH Percentile96.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score3.04
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements