Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A volunteer-supported walking programme to improve physical function in older people (the POWER Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BMC geriatrics
January 1, 1970
Nina Grede et al. (11 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether volunteer-supported outdoor walking improves physical function and quality of life in older people with inadequate activity levels.

Results Summary

The study expects the intervention to improve overall health status across various outcomes, including physical function and quality of life, though specific results are not detailed in the abstract.

Population

Individuals older than 65 years living in the community or nursing homes.

Effective Dosage

Three times a week for 30-50 minutes per session (outdoor walk or equivalent indoor activity).

Duration

6 months

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
volunteer-supported outdoor-walking
increase
physical function
older people with inadequate activity levels
-
improves
#1
volunteer-supported outdoor-walking
increase
quality of life
older people with inadequate activity levels
-
improves
#2
supported physical activity intervention
increase
overall health status
participants
-
improve
#3
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently 21% of the German population is older than 65 years. Above this age, the risk of suffering from chronic disease and mental disorders increases rapidly. Therefore, physical inactivity is one of the most important public health concerns among older people. To address this issue, we have conceptualised and evaluated a simple and low-threshold intervention, which requires only minimal demand on the participants, targeting older people with inadequate activity levels. The aim of the POWER Study is to investigate whether volunteer-supported outdoor-walking improves physical function and quality of life in older people. METHODS/DESIGN: In a randomised, controlled interventional superiority-trial, individuals older than 65 years of age living in the community or nursing homes will be randomised into two groups. The study will be conducted in two study centres with assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The intervention group will participate in a supported physical activity intervention for 6 months. An assigned volunteer will visit them three times a week for an outdoor walk between 30 and 50 min, or equivalent indoor activity. Persons in the control group will be invited to two lectures covering topics related to health. Primary endpoint is the physical function measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. Secondary and safety endpoints will be quality of life (EQ. 5D), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale), physical activity (activity diary), cognitive executive function (clock drawing test), falls requiring medical attention, hospitalisation and death. Primary analysis will be carried out by intention to treat. DISCUSSION: We expect the intervention to improve the overall health status of the participants in a wide range of health-related outcomes. If effectiveness can be shown, the intervention will close an important gap in current services for older people. We will disseminate our experiences and results in the form of informational documents (training manual) to allow municipalities and health care organisations to implement a similar intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on 31 Aug 2018; German Clinical Trials Register (www.germanctr.de), Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien: DRKS00015188 .

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFearHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVolunteersWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year0.5
Relative Citation Ratio0.33
NIH Percentile17.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.48
Normalized Score0.80
Related Supplements