Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Examining the efficacy of video-based microinterventions for improving risk and protective factors for disordered eating among young adult women.

The International journal of eating disorders
May 1, 2021
Melissa J Atkinson et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effects of mindfulness-based microinterventions on risk and protective factors for disordered eating in response to appearance-ideal media.

Results Summary

Mindfulness showed significant immediate benefits in reducing state appearance-ideal internalization, perceived sociocultural pressures, distress, and improving mood, with sustained improvements in trait appearance-ideal internalization and body appreciation at 1-week follow-up. However, no effects were observed on state weight/appearance satisfaction, trait perceived pressures, negative affect, or body image psychological flexibility.

Population

Undergraduate women (N = 202)

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Immediate effects assessed post-intervention; follow-up at 1 week

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (26)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness microintervention
decrease
state appearance-ideal internalization
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#1
dissonance microintervention
decrease
state appearance-ideal internalization
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#2
mindfulness microintervention
decrease
perceived sociocultural pressures
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#3
dissonance microintervention
decrease
perceived sociocultural pressures
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#4
mindfulness microintervention
decrease
related distress
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#5
dissonance microintervention
decrease
related distress
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#6
mindfulness microintervention
increase
mood
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#7
dissonance microintervention
increase
mood
undergraduate women
Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94
significant immediate benefits
#8
mindfulness microintervention
no change
state weight satisfaction
undergraduate women
-
no benefits
#9
dissonance microintervention
no change
state weight satisfaction
undergraduate women
-
no benefits
#10
mindfulness microintervention
no change
state appearance satisfaction
undergraduate women
-
no benefits
#11
dissonance microintervention
no change
state appearance satisfaction
undergraduate women
-
no benefits
#12
mindfulness microintervention
decrease
trait appearance-ideal internalization
undergraduate women
Δ = .40
improved
#13
dissonance microintervention
decrease
trait appearance-ideal internalization
undergraduate women
Δ = .42
improved
#14
mindfulness microintervention
decrease
weight and shape concerns
undergraduate women
Δ = .27 [ns]
improved
#15
dissonance microintervention
decrease
weight and shape concerns
undergraduate women
Δ = .44
improved
#16
mindfulness microintervention
increase
body appreciation
undergraduate women
Δ = .39
improved
#17
dissonance microintervention
increase
body appreciation
undergraduate women
Δ = .46
improved
#18
mindfulness microintervention
no change
trait perceived pressures
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#19
dissonance microintervention
no change
trait perceived pressures
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#20
mindfulness microintervention
no change
negative affect
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#21
dissonance microintervention
no change
negative affect
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#22
mindfulness microintervention
no change
body image psychological flexibility
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#23
dissonance microintervention
no change
body image psychological flexibility
undergraduate women
-
no effects
#24
mindfulness microintervention
no change
state outcomes from premedia to postmedia exposure
undergraduate women
-
no differential changes
#25
dissonance microintervention
no change
state outcomes from premedia to postmedia exposure
undergraduate women
-
no differential changes
#26
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brief self-guided activities designed for focused and immediate benefits, termed microinterventions, have the potential to aid reach and engagement in mental health interventions; however further validation is needed. This study evaluated effects of two microinterventions for responding to appearance-ideal media on risk and protective factors for disordered eating. METHOD: Undergraduate women (N = 202, M RESULTS: Both mindfulness and dissonance groups reported significant immediate benefits to state appearance-ideal internalization, perceived sociocultural pressures and related distress, and mood, compared to educational control (Glass's Δ effect sizes = .40-.94), but not state weight or appearance satisfaction. At 1-week follow-up, mindfulness and dissonance groups demonstrated improved trait appearance-ideal internalization (Δ = .40 and .42), weight and shape concerns (Δ = .27 [ns] and .44), and body appreciation (Δ = .39 and .46) compared to the educational control. There were no effects on trait perceived pressures, negative affect, or body image psychological flexibility, and no differential changes in state outcomes from premedia to postmedia exposure. DISCUSSION: Microinterventions using mindfulness and dissonance techniques show promise for improving some risk and potential protective factors for disordered eating in the immediate and short-term. Further research is required to substantiate their place within the spectrum of eating disorder prevention, early intervention and treatment techniques.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Body ImageCognitive DissonanceFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansPersonal SatisfactionProtective FactorsYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year3.5
Relative Citation Ratio2.11
NIH Percentile76.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.53
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements