Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effects of neuromuscular training compared to classic strength-resistance training in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

PloS one
January 1, 2020
Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues et al. (10 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of neuromuscular versus classical strength-resistance training in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-limb performance, and quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients.

Results Summary

The study will evaluate the mean difference in change from baseline in the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test, cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-limb performance, strength, sexual dysfunction, and quality of life, but results are not yet provided in the abstract.

Population

Thirty patients with acute coronary syndrome recruited from a private tertiary hospital.

Effective Dosage

20 sessions divided into aerobic training and neuromuscular or classical strength-resistance training.

Duration

Not specified (20 sessions).

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
mean difference in change from baseline in the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#1
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
cardiorespiratory fitness
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#2
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
lower-limb performance
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#3
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
lower-limb strength
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#4
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
sexual dysfunction
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#5
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
quality of life
patients following acute coronary syndrome
-
evaluate the effectiveness
#6
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
cardiorespiratory fitness
cardiac patients
-
provide evidence for the effectiveness
#7
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
lower-limb performance capacities
cardiac patients
-
provide evidence for the effectiveness
#8
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
neutral
quality of life
cardiac patients
-
provide evidence for the effectiveness
#9
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
increase
return to their everyday activities of life
these patients
-
may enhance the speed
#10
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
increase
movement patterns
these patients
-
improve the efficiency
#11
neuromuscular strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme
increase
heart responses
these patients
-
improve the efficiency
#12
Abstract

The aim of the present clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of neuromuscular versus classical strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme in patients following acute coronary syndrome. The study is designed as a double-blinded, randomised, and controlled clinical trial. Thirty participants suffering from acute coronary syndrome who meet our inclusion criteria will be recruited by a private tertiary hospital. The intervention group will follow 20 sessions of a cardiac rehabilitation programme divided into two parts: aerobic training and neuromuscular strength-resistance training. The control group will complete the same aerobic training as well as a classical strength-resistance training workout programme. The primary outcome of the study will be the mean difference in change from baseline in the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test. The secondary outcomes will be the cardiorespiratory fitness of the patients (assessed by means of the Chester Step Test), lower-limb performance (assessed with the 30-Second Chair Stand Test and Single-Leg Squat Test), lower-limb strength (hip flexor handheld dynamometry), sexual dysfunction assessment (Sex Health Inventory for Men) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). This work will provide evidence for the effectiveness of a neuromuscular versus a classic strength-training programme in terms of cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-limb performance capacities and quality of life, in cardiac patients. The data obtained could lead to more effective and functional workouts which, in turn, may enhance the speed at which these patients can return to their everyday activities of life and improve the efficiency of their movement patterns and heart responses. Furthermore, patients may find neuromuscular workout routines more motivating and engaging, thus encouraging them to adopt healthier lifestyle patterns.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Acute Coronary SyndromeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TestFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalPhysical FitnessQuality of LifeResistance TrainingTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year0.4
Relative Citation Ratio0.24
NIH Percentile12.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score2.15
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Effects of neuromuscular training compared to classic streng... | Panacea Index