Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) for Stepped Care Management of Low Back Pain in the Military Health System: A Trial Protocol.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
January 1, 1970
Julie M Fritz et al. (9 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based treatment (Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement, MORE) compared to combined Move2Health + physical therapy for chronic low back pain in a stepped care framework.

Results Summary

The study did not report specific results for mindfulness in the abstract, but it is part of a pragmatic trial assessing nonpharmacologic treatments for chronic low back pain, with pain interference as the primary outcome.

Population

Military personnel and beneficiaries from three military treatment facilities with chronic low back pain.

Effective Dosage

Not specified in the abstract.

Duration

Phase II treatment duration not explicitly stated, but phase I was 6 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
physical therapy (PT)
neutral
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference computer-adapted test score
participants from three military treatment facilities
-
-
#1
Army Medicine's holistic Move2Health (M2H) program in a package specific to low back pain
neutral
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference computer-adapted test score
participants from three military treatment facilities
-
-
#2
combined M2H + PT
neutral
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference computer-adapted test score
nonresponders to treatment in phase I
-
-
#3
mindfulness-based treatment using the Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) program
neutral
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference computer-adapted test score
nonresponders to treatment in phase I
-
-
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Defense Health Agency has prioritized system-level pain management initiatives within the Military Health System (MHS), with low back pain as one of the key focus areas. A stepped care model focused on nonpharmacologic treatment to promote self-management is recommended. Implementation of stepped care is complicated by lack of information on the most effective nonpharmacologic strategies and how to sequence and tailor the various available options. The Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomization Trial for Low Back Pain (SMART LBP) is a multisite pragmatic trial using a SMART design to assess the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic treatments for chronic low back pain. DESIGN: This SMART trial has two treatment phases. Participants from three military treatment facilities are randomized to 6 weeks of phase I treatment, receiving either physical therapy (PT) or Army Medicine's holistic Move2Health (M2H) program in a package specific to low back pain. Nonresponders to treatment in phase I are again randomized to phase II treatment of combined M2H + PT or mindfulness-based treatment using the Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) program. The primary outcome is the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference computer-adapted test score. SUMMARY: This trial is part of an initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Defense to establish a national infrastructure for effective system-level management of chronic pain with a focus on nonpharmacologic treatments. The results of this study will provide important information on nonpharmacologic care for chronic LBP in the MHS embedded within a stepped care framework.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Chronic PainHumansLow Back PainMilitary Health ServicesMindfulnessPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations20
Citations/Year4.0
Relative Citation Ratio1.84
NIH Percentile72%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.81
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements