Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Differential Responses to Dietary Protein and Carbohydrate Ratio on Gut Microbiome in Obese vs. Lean Cats.

Frontiers in microbiology
May 5, 2020
Qinghong Li et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to understand how a high-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet influences gut microbiota in obese versus lean domestic cats.

Results Summary

The HPLC diet significantly altered gut microbiome composition, particularly in obese cats, increasing Fusobacteria and certain SCFA producers (Faecalibacterium, Fusobacterium) while decreasing others (Megasphaera, Bifidobacterium, Veillonella). The effect was more pronounced in obese cats than lean ones, suggesting differential metabolic responses.

Population

39 domestic short-haired cats (lean and obese, median age 7.2 years).

Effective Dosage

51.4% protein and 11.6% carbohydrate (HPLC diet) vs. 32.4% protein and 32.3% carbohydrate (control diet).

Duration

8 weeks control diet, followed by 8 weeks intervention.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
neutral
gut microbiome
domestic short-haired cats
-
had a significant impact on
#1
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
neutral
gut microbiome
obese (OW) cats
-
effect was more pronounced in
#2
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
no change
gut microbiome
lean (LN) cats
-
no microbial taxon was different between groups in
#3
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
increase
Fusobacteria
obese (OW) cats
-
became more abundant in HPLC-fed cats than in CON-fed cats
#4
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
increase
Faecalibacterium and Fusobacterium
obese (OW) cats
-
are more abundant in HPLC-fed cats
#5
control (CON) diet
increase
Megasphaera, Bifidobacterium, and Veillonella
obese (OW) cats
-
abundances increased in CON-fed cats
#6
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
neutral
predicted microbial gene networks for energy metabolism and one-carbon metabolism pathways
domestic short-haired cats
-
showed changes in
#7
High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet
neutral
gut microbiome
obese vs. lean cats
-
demonstrated differential responses to
#8
Abstract

More than 60% of domestic cats in the United States are either overweight or obese (OW). High-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diets have been recommended for weight management for humans and pets. Gut microbes can influence the host's health and metabolism. Less is known about feline gut microbiomes compared to other species. Thirty-nine lean (LN) and OW domestic short-haired cats (median age, 7.2 years) with median body fat of 15.8 and 32.5%, respectively, were enrolled in a two-phase study. All cats were fed the control diet (CON) with 32.4% protein and 32.3% carbohydrate for 8 weeks followed by another 8 weeks of intervention where half of the cats continued the CON diet while the other half were switched to a HPLC diet with 51.4% protein and 11.6% carbohydrate. The goal was to understand how the HPLC diet influenced gut microbiota in obese vs. lean cats. The 16S rRNA gene profiling study revealed a significant impact on gut microbiome by dietary protein and carbohydrate ratio. The effect was more pronounced in OW cats than LN cats. While no microbial taxon was different between groups in LN cats, compositional changes occurred at different taxonomical ranks in OW cats. At the phylum level, Fusobacteria became more abundant in HPLC-fed cats than in CON-fed cats. At the genus level, five short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers had altered compositions in response to the diets: Faecalibacterium and Fusobacterium are more abundant in HPLC-fed cats while the abundances of Megasphaera, Bifidobacterium, and Veillonella increased in CON-fed cats. Predicted microbial gene networks showed changes in energy metabolism and one-carbon metabolism pathways. Our study demonstrated differential responses to HPLC diet between obese vs. lean cats and opportunities to explore these SCFA-producers for weight management in cats.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations9
Citations/Year1.8
Relative Citation Ratio0.70
NIH Percentile37.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.19
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements