Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Valine-restricted diet for patients with ECHS1 deficiency: Divergent clinical outcomes in two Japanese siblings.

Brain & development
February 1, 2021
Ikuko Sato-Shirai et al. (10 authors)
Case ReportsJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of valine restriction, cysteamine, and NAC in patients with ECHS1 deficiency (ECHS1D) to mitigate neurodegeneration and improve neurological outcomes.

Results Summary

Valine restriction reduced excretion of toxic metabolites and improved neurological outcomes in one sibling, while cysteamine and NAC did not prevent Leigh syndrome in the other. Early dietary intervention showed better results compared to delayed treatment.

Population

Two siblings with ECHS1 deficiency presenting Leigh syndrome.

Effective Dosage

Not specified (low protein diet and valine-restricted diet).

Duration

Varied (elder sister started at 4 years, younger brother at 14 months).

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low protein diet (LPD)
no change
neurological status
elder sister with ECHS1D
-
no obvious neurological change
#1
cysteamine and NAC treatment
no change
development of Leigh syndrome
younger brother with ECHS1D
-
could not prevent him developing LS
#2
low protein diet (LPD)
increase
motor function
younger brother with ECHS1D
-
regained his ability to roll over
#3
valine-restricted diet
decrease
brain MRI hyperintensity
younger brother with ECHS1D
-
brain magnetic resonance image hyperintensity was diminished
#4
valine-restricted diet
decrease
lactate peak on MRS
younger brother with ECHS1D
-
lactate peak on magnetic resonance spectroscopy decreased
#5
dietary therapy
decrease
excretion of valine metabolites
both siblings with ECHS1D
-
excretion of valine metabolites decreased
#6
early initiation of dietary therapy
decrease
neurological sequelae
patients with ECHS1D
-
may reduce neurological sequelae
#7
Abstract

BACKGROUND: ECHS1 is a key enzyme of the valine catabolic pathway and oxidation of fatty acids. In ECHS1 deficiency (ECHS1D), accumulation of toxic intermediates from the valine induces neurodegeneration, which presents Leigh syndrome (LS). Therefore, valine restriction is suggested as an effective therapy. Further, cysteamine may detoxify the toxic metabolites themselves and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant preventing neurological affect. Herein, we report the therapeutic effects of dietary therapy, cysteamine, and NAC in two siblings with ECHS1D, including their clinical, neuroradiological, and chemical aspects. CASE REPORT: The elder sister was the proband and was diagnosed as LS at 13 months of age. Gene analysis identified compound heterozygous ECHS1 mutations. Her psychomotor development was regressed, and she became bedridden. At 4 years old she started a low protein diet (LPD), but with no obvious neurological change. The younger brother was confirmed early with ECHS1D and received cysteamine and NAC treatment from 5 months of age, which could not prevent him developing LS at 7 months of age. Thus, we started a LPD at 14 months of age, with which he regained his ability to roll over, then we proceeded to a valine-restricted diet. The brain magnetic resonance image hyperintensity was diminished, and the lactate peak on magnetic resonance spectroscopy decreased. His neurological outcome is better than his elder sister. In both cases, excretion of valine metabolites decreased after dietary therapy without obvious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of dietary therapy may reduce neurological sequelae in patients with ECHS1D.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AcetylcysteineCysteamineDiet TherapyEnoyl-CoA HydrataseFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfantJapanLeigh DiseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMutationPedigreeSiblingsTreatment OutcomeValine
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety70
Efficacy65/10
Quality50/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations15
Citations/Year3.8
Relative Citation Ratio1.70
NIH Percentile69.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.96
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements