Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open
January 1, 1970
Natasha Celeste Pocovi et al. (11 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualized walking and education program for preventing recurrences of low back pain in adults.

Results Summary

The study is ongoing, but it compares a walking and education intervention with a no-treatment control group, measuring time to recurrence of low back pain, disability, quality of life, and associated costs over 12 months.

Population

Adults who have recovered from an episode of non-specific low back pain within the last 6 months.

Effective Dosage

Six sessions (three face-to-face and three telephone-delivered) with a physiotherapist over 6 months to facilitate a progressive walking program and education.

Duration

6 months

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
progressive and individualised walking and education programme
decrease
prevention of LBP recurrences
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
#1
walking and education
neutral
days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#2
walking and education
neutral
days to recurrence of an episode of LBP
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#3
walking and education
neutral
days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#4
walking and education
neutral
disability
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#5
walking and education
neutral
quality of life
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#6
walking and education
neutral
costs associated with LBP recurrence
adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months
-
compared with
#7
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been established. Walking is a simple, widely accessible, low-cost intervention that has yet to be evaluated. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualised walking and education programme (intervention) for the prevention of LBP recurrences in adults compared with no treatment (control). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, two-armed RCT comparing walking and education (n=349) with a no treatment control group (n=349). Inclusion criteria are adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months. Those allocated to the intervention group will receive six sessions (three face to face and three telephone delivered) with a trained physiotherapist to facilitate a progressive walking programme and education over a 6-month period. The primary outcome will be days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP. The secondary outcomes include days to recurrence of an episode of LBP, days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking, disability and quality of life measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and costs associated with LBP recurrence. All participants will be followed up monthly for a minimum of 12 months. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will assess difference in survival curves (days to recurrence) using the log-rank statistic. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 5201949218164, May 2019). Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001134112.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisExercise TherapyHumansLow Back PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceWalking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations5
Citations/Year1.0
Relative Citation Ratio0.40
NIH Percentile21.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.63
Normalized Score0.83
Related Supplements