Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 15 randomised controlled trials.

Postgraduate medical journal
December 1, 2020
Junyi Zhang et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and iron deficiency (ID), including its impact on exercise capacity (measured by 6MWT distance) and quality of life.

Results Summary

Iron therapy improved 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance and quality of life in CHF patients with ID, but did not significantly reduce all-cause or cardiovascular death. It also reduced cardiovascular hospitalizations and improved cardiac function without increasing adverse events.

Population

Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and iron deficiency (ID), regardless of anemia status.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (16)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
iron therapy
decrease
cardiovascular hospitalisation
patients with CHF with ID
OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.99, p=0.049
was demonstrated to reduce the risk of
#1
iron therapy
no change
all-cause death
patients with CHF with ID
OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.06, p=0.078
was ineffective in reducing
#2
iron therapy
no change
cardiovascular death
patients with CHF with ID
OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.63, p=0.540
was ineffective in reducing
#3
iron therapy
decrease
NYHA class
patients with CHF with ID
mean difference (MD) -0.73, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.47, p<0.001
resulted in a reduction in
#4
iron therapy
increase
LVEF
patients with CHF with ID
MD +4.35, 95% CI 0.69 to 8.00, p=0.020
an increase in
#5
iron therapy
increase
6MWT distance
patients with CHF with ID
MD +35.44, 95% CI 11.55 to 59.33, p=0.004
an increase in
#6
iron therapy
increase
QoL: EQ-5D score
patients with CHF with ID
MD +4.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.31, p=0.014
an improvement in
#7
iron therapy
decrease
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score
patients with CHF with ID
MD -19.47, 95% CI -23.36 to -15.59, p<0.001
an improvement in
#8
iron therapy
increase
Patients Global Assessment (PGA) scale
patients with CHF with ID
MD 0.71, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.10, p<0.001
an improvement in
#9
iron therapy
no change
adverse events
patients with CHF with ID
-
no significant difference in
#10
iron therapy
no change
serious adverse events
patients with CHF with ID
-
no significant difference in
#11
iron therapy
decrease
cardiovascular hospitalisation
patients with CHF with ID
-
reduces
#12
iron therapy
increase
cardiac function
patients with CHF with ID and anaemia
-
improves
#13
iron therapy
increase
exercise capacity
patients with CHF with ID and anaemia
-
improves
#14
iron therapy
increase
QoL
patients with CHF with ID and anaemia
-
improves
#15
iron therapy
no change
adverse events
patients with CHF with ID and anaemia
-
without an increase of
#16
Abstract

Trials studying iron administration in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and iron deficiency (ID) have sprung up these years but the results remain inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with CHF and ID. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, OVID and Web of Science up to 31 July 2019 to search for randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing iron therapy with placebo in CHF with ID, regardless of presence of anaemia. Published studies reporting data of any of the following outcomes were included: all-cause death, cardiovascular hospitalisation, adverse events, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, peak oxygen consumption, 6 min walking test (6MWT) distance and quality of life (QoL) parameters. 15 RCTs with a total of 1627 patients (911 in iron therapy and 716 in control) were included. Iron therapy was demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalisation (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.99, p=0.049), but was ineffective in reducing all-cause death (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.06, p=0.078) or cardiovascular death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.63, p=0.540). Iron therapy resulted in a reduction in NYHA class (mean difference (MD) -0.73, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.47, p<0.001), an increase in LVEF (MD +4.35, 95% CI 0.69 to 8.00, p=0.020), 6MWT distance (MD +35.44, 95% CI 11.55 to 59.33, p=0.004) and an improvement in QoL: EQ-5D score (MD +4.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.31, p=0.014); Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MD -19.47, 95% CI -23.36 to -15.59, p<0.001) and Patients Global Assessment (PGA) scale (MD 0.71, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.10, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in adverse events or serious adverse events between iron treatment group and control group. Iron therapy reduces cardiovascular hospitalisation in patients with CHF with ID, and additionally improves cardiac function, exercise capacity and QoL in patients with CHF with ID and anaemia, without an increase of adverse events.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyHeart FailureHematinicsHumansIronIron DeficienciesTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations13
Citations/Year2.6
Relative Citation Ratio0.98
NIH Percentile49.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.45
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with chronic... | Panacea Index