Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The Effects of a High-Protein Diet on Markers of Muscle Damage Following Exercise in Active Older Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism
September 1, 2020
Tom Clifford et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine if a higher protein diet (2.50 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹) was more effective than a moderate protein diet (1.25 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹) in reducing markers of muscle damage and inflammation after strenuous exercise in older adults.

Results Summary

The study found no significant differences between the higher and moderate protein diets in attenuating muscle damage or inflammation markers post-exercise, except for a delayed peak in muscle soreness with the higher protein diet. Most inflammatory markers and muscle damage indicators remained unchanged by the intervention.

Population

Older adults (10 males and 8 females, age 57 ± 4 years).

Effective Dosage

2.50 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ (higher protein) and 1.25 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ (moderate protein).

Duration

48 hours.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (15)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
higher protein diet (2.50 g·kg-1·day-1)
no change
indirect markers of muscle damage and inflammation
older adults
-
is not more effective than 1.25 g·kg-1·day-1 for attenuating
#1
strenuous exercise (140 squats)
decrease
maximal isometric voluntary contractions
older adults
-
decreased
#2
higher protein diet (2.50 g·kg-1·day-1) vs moderate protein diet (1.25 g·kg-1·day-1)
no change
maximal isometric voluntary contractions
older adults
-
did not differ between groups
#3
moderate protein diet (1.25 g·kg-1·day-1)
increase
muscle soreness
older adults
44 ± 30 mm
peaked at 24 hr post
#4
higher protein diet (2.50 g·kg-1·day-1)
increase
muscle soreness
older adults
70 ± 46 mm
peaked at 48 hr post
#5
higher protein diet (2.50 g·kg-1·day-1) vs moderate protein diet (1.25 g·kg-1·day-1)
no change
muscle soreness
older adults
-
no group differences were found
#6
strenuous exercise (140 squats)
decrease
monocytes
older adults
-
significantly decreased postexercise
#7
strenuous exercise (140 squats)
decrease
lymphocytes
older adults
-
significantly decreased postexercise
#8
strenuous exercise (140 squats)
increase
eosinophils
older adults
-
increased 24 hr postexercise
#9
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
neutrophils
older adults
-
were unchanged
#10
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
creatine kinase
older adults
-
were unchanged
#11
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
interleukin-6
older adults
-
were unchanged
#12
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
C-reactive protein
older adults
-
were unchanged
#13
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
monocyte chemotactic protein-1
older adults
-
were unchanged
#14
strenuous exercise (140 squats) or higher protein diet intervention
no change
Brief Assessment of Mood Adapted
older adults
-
were unchanged
#15
Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined whether a higher protein diet following strenuous exercise can alter markers of muscle damage and inflammation in older adults. METHODS: Using a double-blind, independent group design, 10 males and eight females (age 57 ± 4 years; mass 72.3 ± 5.6 kg; height 1.7 ± 6.5 m) were supplied with a higher protein (2.50 g·kg-1·day-1) or moderate protein (1.25 g·kg-1·day-1) diet for 48 hr after 140 squats with 25% of their body mass. Maximal isometric voluntary contractions, muscle soreness, creatine kinase, Brief Assessment of Mood Adapted, and inflammatory markers were measured preexercise, and 24 hr and 48 hr postexercise. RESULTS: The maximal isometric voluntary contractions decreased postexercise (p = .001, ηp2=.421), but did not differ between groups (p = .822, ηp2=.012). Muscle soreness peaked at 24 hr post in moderate protein (44 ± 30 mm) and 48 hr post in higher protein (70 ± 46 mm; p = .005; ηp2=.282); however, no group differences were found (p = .585; ηp2=.083). Monocytes and lymphocytes significantly decreased postexercise, and eosinophils increased 24 hr postexercise (p < 0.05), but neutrophils, creatine kinase, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and Brief Assessment of Mood Adapted were unchanged by exercise or the intervention (p > .05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 2.50 g·kg-1·day-1 of protein is not more effective than 1.25 g·kg-1·day-1 for attenuating indirect markers of muscle damage and inflammation following strenuous exercise in older adults.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
BiomarkersDiet, High-ProteinDouble-Blind MethodExerciseFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedMyalgiaMyositis
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy30/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations1
Citations/Year0.2
Relative Citation Ratio0.11
NIH Percentile5.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.92
Normalized Score0.47
Related Supplements